YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    BBR and DSR Testing of Aging Properties of Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid–Modified Asphalt Binders

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Liu Xiaoming;Cao Fengjie;Xiao Feipeng;Amirkhanian Serji
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002440
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This work evaluated the effect of polymer and polyphosphoric acid (PPA) on the aging resistance of different asphalt binders with pressure-aging-vessel (PAV) aging. Two base asphalt binders, three polymers, one recycled crumb rubber, and one PPA were used to produce the modified binders. The tested aging resistance included failure temperature, fatigue factor (G*·sinδ), phase angle by dynamic-shear-rheometer (DSR) testing, stiffness (S), and creep rate (m-value) by beam-bending-rheometer (BBR) testing. The G*·sinδ values of the modified binders produced by 2% oxidized polyethylene or propylene–maleic anhydride and .5% PPA are lower than that of the modified binders produced by 3% oxidized polyethylene or propylene–maleic anhydride. Similarly, the modified binders produced by 2% styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) and rubber and .5% PPA show a lower fatigue factor value than those produced by 3% SBS and rubber. The asphalt binders blended with .5% PPA show lower phase-angle values than those produced by 3% oxidized polyethylene, propylene–maleic anhydride, or SBS. Moreover, the phase-angle value of the modified binder containing 2% SBS and .5% PPA is the lowest. The low-temperature stiffness and failure of modified asphalt with PPA is reduced to 23, 18, and 2°C. Compared with the polymer-modified asphalt, the difference between the stiffness of modified-asphalt binder with PPA at the test temperature of −18°C decreased by 16.67, 25, 4.17, and 4.17%, respectively. The results showed that using .5% PPA as 1.% polymer replacement has a positive influence on the aging properties of binders. Moreover, the polymers, PPA, and binder sources can obviously influence the fatigue resistance of the binders.
    • Download: (681.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      BBR and DSR Testing of Aging Properties of Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid–Modified Asphalt Binders

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247789
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLiu Xiaoming;Cao Fengjie;Xiao Feipeng;Amirkhanian Serji
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:32:54Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:32:54Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0002440.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247789
    description abstractThis work evaluated the effect of polymer and polyphosphoric acid (PPA) on the aging resistance of different asphalt binders with pressure-aging-vessel (PAV) aging. Two base asphalt binders, three polymers, one recycled crumb rubber, and one PPA were used to produce the modified binders. The tested aging resistance included failure temperature, fatigue factor (G*·sinδ), phase angle by dynamic-shear-rheometer (DSR) testing, stiffness (S), and creep rate (m-value) by beam-bending-rheometer (BBR) testing. The G*·sinδ values of the modified binders produced by 2% oxidized polyethylene or propylene–maleic anhydride and .5% PPA are lower than that of the modified binders produced by 3% oxidized polyethylene or propylene–maleic anhydride. Similarly, the modified binders produced by 2% styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) and rubber and .5% PPA show a lower fatigue factor value than those produced by 3% SBS and rubber. The asphalt binders blended with .5% PPA show lower phase-angle values than those produced by 3% oxidized polyethylene, propylene–maleic anhydride, or SBS. Moreover, the phase-angle value of the modified binder containing 2% SBS and .5% PPA is the lowest. The low-temperature stiffness and failure of modified asphalt with PPA is reduced to 23, 18, and 2°C. Compared with the polymer-modified asphalt, the difference between the stiffness of modified-asphalt binder with PPA at the test temperature of −18°C decreased by 16.67, 25, 4.17, and 4.17%, respectively. The results showed that using .5% PPA as 1.% polymer replacement has a positive influence on the aging properties of binders. Moreover, the polymers, PPA, and binder sources can obviously influence the fatigue resistance of the binders.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBBR and DSR Testing of Aging Properties of Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid–Modified Asphalt Binders
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002440
    page4018249
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian