YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Shear Strength between Poroelastic Road Surface and Sublayer with Different Bonding Agents

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Liao Gongyun;Wang Hao;Zhu Hongzhou;Sun Peixiang;Chen Huaqing
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002216
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Insufficient bonding strength between a poroelastic road surface (PERS) and a sublayer usually induces premature delamination failure. The objective of this paper was to investigate the shear bonding strength of the PERS-sublayer interface with different bonding agents and develop polyurethane-bound grain (PUG) as an alternative bonding agent. The inclined shear test was utilized to measure shear bonding strengths of control (without bonding agents) and interface-treated samples. The effects of polyurethane content within PERS, sublayer type, temperature, and freeze-thaw conditions on PERS-sublayer shear bonding strengths were investigated for control samples. Shear bonding strengths between the PERS and sublayer with a PUG layer were compared to those with epoxy asphalt and polyurethane for interface-treated samples. It was found that shear bonding strengths between PERS and asphalt-bound sublayers substantially decreased, with the increase of temperature or after one freeze-thaw cycle. Shear bonding strengths between PERS and asphalt-bound sublayers were smaller than the ones between PERS and cement-bound sublayers, regardless of polyurethane content, temperature, or freeze-thaw condition. The PUG layer enhanced PERS-sublayer interface bonding and achieved comparative bonding strength to epoxy asphalt, which was greater than the bonding strength brought by pure polyurethane. A PUG layer with 7% polyurethane produced more than 1.5-MPa shear bonding strength at 6°C for the grain size considered in this study.
    • Download: (1.224Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Shear Strength between Poroelastic Road Surface and Sublayer with Different Bonding Agents

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247586
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLiao Gongyun;Wang Hao;Zhu Hongzhou;Sun Peixiang;Chen Huaqing
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:31:26Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:31:26Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0002216.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247586
    description abstractInsufficient bonding strength between a poroelastic road surface (PERS) and a sublayer usually induces premature delamination failure. The objective of this paper was to investigate the shear bonding strength of the PERS-sublayer interface with different bonding agents and develop polyurethane-bound grain (PUG) as an alternative bonding agent. The inclined shear test was utilized to measure shear bonding strengths of control (without bonding agents) and interface-treated samples. The effects of polyurethane content within PERS, sublayer type, temperature, and freeze-thaw conditions on PERS-sublayer shear bonding strengths were investigated for control samples. Shear bonding strengths between the PERS and sublayer with a PUG layer were compared to those with epoxy asphalt and polyurethane for interface-treated samples. It was found that shear bonding strengths between PERS and asphalt-bound sublayers substantially decreased, with the increase of temperature or after one freeze-thaw cycle. Shear bonding strengths between PERS and asphalt-bound sublayers were smaller than the ones between PERS and cement-bound sublayers, regardless of polyurethane content, temperature, or freeze-thaw condition. The PUG layer enhanced PERS-sublayer interface bonding and achieved comparative bonding strength to epoxy asphalt, which was greater than the bonding strength brought by pure polyurethane. A PUG layer with 7% polyurethane produced more than 1.5-MPa shear bonding strength at 6°C for the grain size considered in this study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleShear Strength between Poroelastic Road Surface and Sublayer with Different Bonding Agents
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002216
    page4018017
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian