YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Analysis of Federal Design-Build Request for Proposal Evaluation Criteria

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Douglas D. Gransberg
    ,
    Ronald F. Barton
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(105)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This study’s objective is to identify the benefits federal owners are seeking through the design-build process by analysis of research data gathered from 110 requests for proposal (RFP) evaluation plans issued for $1.5 billion of federal work by 11 different agencies. The output from this study was then compared to a 1996 study whose authors sought to analyze the reasons cited by owners to use design-build project delivery. That study included a survey of 108 owners of public and private projects, which represented over $12.5 billion of construction. The goal of comparing the 1996 survey with the results of the new research project is to discover correlations between owner attitudes and the selection criteria identified in government RFPs. The comparison produced some interesting results. First, although owners in 1996 cited schedule as the most significant reason for selecting design-build delivery, the federal RFP content analysis found it to carry a very low average weight. Another finding shows that federal RFPs give price a very heavy weight in the government selection processes, again differing significantly from the previous survey of owner attitudes. Finally, the current study found that the qualifications of the firms and individuals that formed the design-build team were significantly more important than the proposed technical design approach. Thus, this paper concludes that the typical federal agency was looking for a low price from a well-qualified design-build team.
    • Download: (255.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Analysis of Federal Design-Build Request for Proposal Evaluation Criteria

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/42475
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDouglas D. Gransberg
    contributor authorRonald F. Barton
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:58Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:11:58Z
    date copyrightApril 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282007%2923%3A2%28105%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42475
    description abstractThis study’s objective is to identify the benefits federal owners are seeking through the design-build process by analysis of research data gathered from 110 requests for proposal (RFP) evaluation plans issued for $1.5 billion of federal work by 11 different agencies. The output from this study was then compared to a 1996 study whose authors sought to analyze the reasons cited by owners to use design-build project delivery. That study included a survey of 108 owners of public and private projects, which represented over $12.5 billion of construction. The goal of comparing the 1996 survey with the results of the new research project is to discover correlations between owner attitudes and the selection criteria identified in government RFPs. The comparison produced some interesting results. First, although owners in 1996 cited schedule as the most significant reason for selecting design-build delivery, the federal RFP content analysis found it to carry a very low average weight. Another finding shows that federal RFPs give price a very heavy weight in the government selection processes, again differing significantly from the previous survey of owner attitudes. Finally, the current study found that the qualifications of the firms and individuals that formed the design-build team were significantly more important than the proposed technical design approach. Thus, this paper concludes that the typical federal agency was looking for a low price from a well-qualified design-build team.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAnalysis of Federal Design-Build Request for Proposal Evaluation Criteria
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(105)
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian