YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impact of Safety Climate on Types of Safety Motivation and Performance: Multigroup Invariance Analysis

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Wen Lim Huey;Li Nan;Fang Dongping;Wu Chunlin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000595
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Safety climate has a significant impact on safety motivation. Most prior studies focused on how motivated employees are in a unidimensional safety motivation scale, but they have overlooked why employees are motivated to work safely. The self-determination theory (SDT) is adopted in the present study to investigate how safety climate factors can predict different types of motivation (i.e., intrinsic, identified, introjected, external), consequently, affecting safety performance. There were a total of 392 respondents from questionnaire surveys that were undertaken in both the Chinese and Malaysian construction industries. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and path analysis were performed and achieved an invariance model fit across samples. Safety competence and supportive environment were identified as the most important factors that predict intrinsic and identified motivation in the Chinese sample. On the other hand, safety commitment and safety communication were identified to predict intrinsic motivation in the Malaysian sample. In the Malaysian sample, intrinsic motivation predicted not only safety participation but also safety compliance. This was explained by their “self-leadership,” which exerted responsibility and autonomy to the employee’s own safety. The present study contributes to the body of knowledge by revealing the interplay mechanism of different types of safety motivation (multidimensional) in the relationship between safety climate and safety performance. The application of MGCFA and path analysis advances the existing literature by enabling the identification of safety climate factors that can predict types of safety motivation and safety performance. Moreover, the comparison of results between two countries extends the body of research on safety motivation with a cross-cultural perspective. These findings provide practitioners with a guideline to make a more precise assessment of employees’ types of motivation based on which measures can be taken to improve safety management and safety performance, either in domestic or multicultural work teams.
    • Download: (752.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impact of Safety Climate on Types of Safety Motivation and Performance: Multigroup Invariance Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247477
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWen Lim Huey;Li Nan;Fang Dongping;Wu Chunlin
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:30:38Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:30:38Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000595.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247477
    description abstractSafety climate has a significant impact on safety motivation. Most prior studies focused on how motivated employees are in a unidimensional safety motivation scale, but they have overlooked why employees are motivated to work safely. The self-determination theory (SDT) is adopted in the present study to investigate how safety climate factors can predict different types of motivation (i.e., intrinsic, identified, introjected, external), consequently, affecting safety performance. There were a total of 392 respondents from questionnaire surveys that were undertaken in both the Chinese and Malaysian construction industries. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and path analysis were performed and achieved an invariance model fit across samples. Safety competence and supportive environment were identified as the most important factors that predict intrinsic and identified motivation in the Chinese sample. On the other hand, safety commitment and safety communication were identified to predict intrinsic motivation in the Malaysian sample. In the Malaysian sample, intrinsic motivation predicted not only safety participation but also safety compliance. This was explained by their “self-leadership,” which exerted responsibility and autonomy to the employee’s own safety. The present study contributes to the body of knowledge by revealing the interplay mechanism of different types of safety motivation (multidimensional) in the relationship between safety climate and safety performance. The application of MGCFA and path analysis advances the existing literature by enabling the identification of safety climate factors that can predict types of safety motivation and safety performance. Moreover, the comparison of results between two countries extends the body of research on safety motivation with a cross-cultural perspective. These findings provide practitioners with a guideline to make a more precise assessment of employees’ types of motivation based on which measures can be taken to improve safety management and safety performance, either in domestic or multicultural work teams.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleImpact of Safety Climate on Types of Safety Motivation and Performance: Multigroup Invariance Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000595
    page4018002
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian