YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Untitled

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2016:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 001::page 5
    Author:
    McMillan, Justine M.;Hay, Alex E.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0131.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractSpectral and structure function methods are implemented to compute the dissipation rate ε from broadband, diverging-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) data collected at four sites in a high-flow tidal channel. This paper shows that middepth estimates of ε obtained from spectral and second-order structure function (SF2) methods are both lognormally distributed with comparable means and variances. Speed bin?averaged ε values agree to within 16%, depending on the site and tidal phase (ebb/flood). The close agreement between the two independent methods provides further support for the argument put forward by McMillan et al.: that is, that the factor-of-2 difference between shear probe and (spectral) ADCP estimates of ε was likely caused by spatial differences in turbulence levels. The agreement between the spectral and both second- and third-order structure function methods also supports the use of for the SF2 universal constant. Notably, however, the SF3 method was less robust for these data. Two additional aspects of the SF2 approach are examined in some detail: 1) the differences from upstream- and downstream-facing beams are shown to arise from the Reynolds stress and 2) the inability of the ADCP to resolve small-scale motions does not affect the estimates of ε but yields apparent Doppler noise levels that?counterintuitively?decrease with increasing flow speed and increasing dissipation rate. A modified SF2 method that accounts for the variance associated with the unresolved scales removes the flow speed dependence and yields noise level estimates that agree with the spectral values.
    • Download: (2.272Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246736
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMcMillan, Justine M.;Hay, Alex E.
    date accessioned2018-01-03T11:03:38Z
    date available2018-01-03T11:03:38Z
    date copyright10/27/2016 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2016
    identifier otherjtech-d-16-0131.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246736
    description abstractAbstractSpectral and structure function methods are implemented to compute the dissipation rate ε from broadband, diverging-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) data collected at four sites in a high-flow tidal channel. This paper shows that middepth estimates of ε obtained from spectral and second-order structure function (SF2) methods are both lognormally distributed with comparable means and variances. Speed bin?averaged ε values agree to within 16%, depending on the site and tidal phase (ebb/flood). The close agreement between the two independent methods provides further support for the argument put forward by McMillan et al.: that is, that the factor-of-2 difference between shear probe and (spectral) ADCP estimates of ε was likely caused by spatial differences in turbulence levels. The agreement between the spectral and both second- and third-order structure function methods also supports the use of for the SF2 universal constant. Notably, however, the SF3 method was less robust for these data. Two additional aspects of the SF2 approach are examined in some detail: 1) the differences from upstream- and downstream-facing beams are shown to arise from the Reynolds stress and 2) the inability of the ADCP to resolve small-scale motions does not affect the estimates of ε but yields apparent Doppler noise levels that?counterintuitively?decrease with increasing flow speed and increasing dissipation rate. A modified SF2 method that accounts for the variance associated with the unresolved scales removes the flow speed dependence and yields noise level estimates that agree with the spectral values.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0131.1
    journal fristpage5
    journal lastpage20
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2016:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian