YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Precipitating Quasigeostrophic Equations and Potential Vorticity Inversion with Phase Changes

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;Volume( 074 ):;issue: 010::page 3285
    Author:
    Smith, Leslie M.;Stechmann, Samuel N.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0023.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractPrecipitating versions of the quasigeostrophic (QG) equations are derived systematically, starting from the equations of a cloud-resolving model. The presence of phase changes of water from vapor to liquid and vice versa leads to important differences from the dry QG case. The precipitating QG (PQG) equations, in their simplest form, have two variables to describe the full system: a potential vorticity (PV) variable and a variable M including moisture effects. A PV-and-M inversion allows the determination of all other variables, and it involves an elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) that is nonlinear because of phase changes between saturated and unsaturated regions. An example PV-and-M inversion is provided for an idealized cold-core cyclone with two vertical levels. A key point illustrated by this example is that the phase interface location is unknown a priori from PV and M, and it is discovered as part of the inversion process. Several choices of a moist PV variable are discussed, including subtleties that arise because of phase changes. Boussinesq and anelastic versions of the PQG equations are described, as well as moderate and asymptotically large rainfall speeds. An energy conservation principle suggests that the model has firm physical and mathematical underpinnings. Finally, an asymptotic analysis provides a systematic derivation of the PQG equations, which arise as the limiting dynamics of a moist atmosphere with phase changes, in the limit of rapid rotation and strong stratification in terms of both potential temperature and equivalent potential temperature.
    • Download: (840.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Precipitating Quasigeostrophic Equations and Potential Vorticity Inversion with Phase Changes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246487
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSmith, Leslie M.;Stechmann, Samuel N.
    date accessioned2018-01-03T11:02:39Z
    date available2018-01-03T11:02:39Z
    date copyright7/24/2017 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2017
    identifier otherjas-d-17-0023.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246487
    description abstractAbstractPrecipitating versions of the quasigeostrophic (QG) equations are derived systematically, starting from the equations of a cloud-resolving model. The presence of phase changes of water from vapor to liquid and vice versa leads to important differences from the dry QG case. The precipitating QG (PQG) equations, in their simplest form, have two variables to describe the full system: a potential vorticity (PV) variable and a variable M including moisture effects. A PV-and-M inversion allows the determination of all other variables, and it involves an elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) that is nonlinear because of phase changes between saturated and unsaturated regions. An example PV-and-M inversion is provided for an idealized cold-core cyclone with two vertical levels. A key point illustrated by this example is that the phase interface location is unknown a priori from PV and M, and it is discovered as part of the inversion process. Several choices of a moist PV variable are discussed, including subtleties that arise because of phase changes. Boussinesq and anelastic versions of the PQG equations are described, as well as moderate and asymptotically large rainfall speeds. An energy conservation principle suggests that the model has firm physical and mathematical underpinnings. Finally, an asymptotic analysis provides a systematic derivation of the PQG equations, which arise as the limiting dynamics of a moist atmosphere with phase changes, in the limit of rapid rotation and strong stratification in terms of both potential temperature and equivalent potential temperature.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titlePrecipitating Quasigeostrophic Equations and Potential Vorticity Inversion with Phase Changes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume74
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-17-0023.1
    journal fristpage3285
    journal lastpage3303
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;Volume( 074 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian