YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sharing the Big Risk: Assessment Framework for Revenue Risk Sharing Mechanisms in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Ting Liu
    ,
    Michael Bennon
    ,
    Michael J. Garvin
    ,
    Shouqing Wang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001397
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The allocation and management of revenue risk is a critical issue in the development of public-private partnership (PPP) concessions for new roadways. In order to attract financing, governments often provide fiscal support ranging from availability payments (APs) to minimum revenue guarantees (MRGs) to flexible-term contracts when demand and thus the financial viability of a project are uncertain. However, a government’s inability to evaluate these alternatives can lead to either surplus fiscal support ex ante or unexpected liabilities ex post. The authors propose a quantitative methodology to guide governments’ decisions when choosing among the fiscal support mechanisms. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we establish a two-dimensional framework to evaluate fiscal support alternatives by comparing their effects on the financing costs of a project and the risk retained by a procuring government. We use a stochastic revenue projection model to quantify the revenue risk and the framework’s measurable indicators. We apply our framework using a hypothetical case study. The case results demonstrate that flexible-term contracts do little to increase project leverage, MRGs are most applicable to projects with significant revenue volatility, and APs are more appropriate in projects with lower revenue volatility. The framework allows governments to make more informed decisions about revenue risk sharing mechanisms to improve public budgeting and deficit control.
    • Download: (543.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sharing the Big Risk: Assessment Framework for Revenue Risk Sharing Mechanisms in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245687
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTing Liu
    contributor authorMichael Bennon
    contributor authorMichael J. Garvin
    contributor authorShouqing Wang
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:06:25Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:06:25Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001397.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245687
    description abstractThe allocation and management of revenue risk is a critical issue in the development of public-private partnership (PPP) concessions for new roadways. In order to attract financing, governments often provide fiscal support ranging from availability payments (APs) to minimum revenue guarantees (MRGs) to flexible-term contracts when demand and thus the financial viability of a project are uncertain. However, a government’s inability to evaluate these alternatives can lead to either surplus fiscal support ex ante or unexpected liabilities ex post. The authors propose a quantitative methodology to guide governments’ decisions when choosing among the fiscal support mechanisms. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we establish a two-dimensional framework to evaluate fiscal support alternatives by comparing their effects on the financing costs of a project and the risk retained by a procuring government. We use a stochastic revenue projection model to quantify the revenue risk and the framework’s measurable indicators. We apply our framework using a hypothetical case study. The case results demonstrate that flexible-term contracts do little to increase project leverage, MRGs are most applicable to projects with significant revenue volatility, and APs are more appropriate in projects with lower revenue volatility. The framework allows governments to make more informed decisions about revenue risk sharing mechanisms to improve public budgeting and deficit control.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSharing the Big Risk: Assessment Framework for Revenue Risk Sharing Mechanisms in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001397
    page04017086
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian