YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Clifton B. Farnsworth
    ,
    Rebecca O. Warr
    ,
    Justin E. Weidman
    ,
    D. Mark Hutchings
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Teams that deliver complex transportation construction projects need tools that manage risk and allow for successful delivery. Construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) project delivery is an alternative method that furnishes public agencies with an attractive option for delivering projects in a less adversarial and more constructive manner by involving the contractor during the design phase. This paper identifies the effects of CM/GC delivery on construction process risk. Owners, contractors, and design engineers with sizable CM/GC experience on transportation-related projects were surveyed to identify differences in the perception of CM/GC processes, especially compared to design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods. The perceived benefits and disadvantages regarding quality, schedule, cost control, and collaboration/flexibility are discussed. The benefits include strategies for robust process risk management and successful project delivery, while the disadvantages expose barriers of implementation that must be overcome. Ultimately, this research identifies differences in how project teams value CM/GC processes with regard to minimizing construction process risk, thus enabling teams to more effectively facilitate unity and strengthen the CM/GC process.
    • Download: (1.264Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245611
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorClifton B. Farnsworth
    contributor authorRebecca O. Warr
    contributor authorJustin E. Weidman
    contributor authorD. Mark Hutchings
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:06:07Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:06:07Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001091.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245611
    description abstractTeams that deliver complex transportation construction projects need tools that manage risk and allow for successful delivery. Construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) project delivery is an alternative method that furnishes public agencies with an attractive option for delivering projects in a less adversarial and more constructive manner by involving the contractor during the design phase. This paper identifies the effects of CM/GC delivery on construction process risk. Owners, contractors, and design engineers with sizable CM/GC experience on transportation-related projects were surveyed to identify differences in the perception of CM/GC processes, especially compared to design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods. The perceived benefits and disadvantages regarding quality, schedule, cost control, and collaboration/flexibility are discussed. The benefits include strategies for robust process risk management and successful project delivery, while the disadvantages expose barriers of implementation that must be overcome. Ultimately, this research identifies differences in how project teams value CM/GC processes with regard to minimizing construction process risk, thus enabling teams to more effectively facilitate unity and strengthen the CM/GC process.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEffects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091
    page04015091
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian