YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison between ASTM D7205 and CSA S806 Tensile-Testing Methods for Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Bars

    Source: Journal of Composites for Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Brahim Benmokrane
    ,
    Claude Nazair
    ,
    Xavier Seynave
    ,
    Allan Manalo
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000819
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The standards ASTM D7205/D7205M-06 and CSA S806 contain the commonly used test methods for characterizing the tensile properties of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars for use as reinforcement in concrete structures. These standards, however, use different anchor dimensions and loading rates, thereby possibly yielding different properties for the same type of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. This paper assessed the results of a four-laboratory testing program comparing the sample preparation methods and test results according to ASTM D7205 and CSA S806. Each laboratory tested at least 10 samples prepared according to the recommendations in Annex A of the ASTM standard and Annex B of the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standard. Each type of sample was prepared by a single laboratory to minimize variation among the test specimens. The results show a statistically significant difference between the tensile strength measured by using the CSA and ASTM provisions. Regardless of specimen preparation, the modulus of elasticity of the GFRP bars was the same with both test standards, but the ASTM standard returned a wider variation than did the CSA.
    • Download: (922.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison between ASTM D7205 and CSA S806 Tensile-Testing Methods for Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Bars

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245428
    Collections
    • Journal of Composites for Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrahim Benmokrane
    contributor authorClaude Nazair
    contributor authorXavier Seynave
    contributor authorAllan Manalo
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:57Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:04:57Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000819.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245428
    description abstractThe standards ASTM D7205/D7205M-06 and CSA S806 contain the commonly used test methods for characterizing the tensile properties of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars for use as reinforcement in concrete structures. These standards, however, use different anchor dimensions and loading rates, thereby possibly yielding different properties for the same type of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. This paper assessed the results of a four-laboratory testing program comparing the sample preparation methods and test results according to ASTM D7205 and CSA S806. Each laboratory tested at least 10 samples prepared according to the recommendations in Annex A of the ASTM standard and Annex B of the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standard. Each type of sample was prepared by a single laboratory to minimize variation among the test specimens. The results show a statistically significant difference between the tensile strength measured by using the CSA and ASTM provisions. Regardless of specimen preparation, the modulus of elasticity of the GFRP bars was the same with both test standards, but the ASTM standard returned a wider variation than did the CSA.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison between ASTM D7205 and CSA S806 Tensile-Testing Methods for Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Bars
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000819
    page04017038
    treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian