YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Fatigue Performance of Ballastless Track Slabs Reinforced with BFRP and SFCB

    Source: Journal of Composites for Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Yang Yang
    ,
    Gang Wu
    ,
    Zhi-Shen Wu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000728
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The main objective of this research was to evaluate the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bar-reinforced ballastless track slab subjected to a fatigue loading. Five ballastless track slabs were experimentally tested, which were reinforced with steel fiber–reinforced polymer composite bars (SFCBs), basalt fiber–reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars, and traditional steel bars, respectively. All slabs were loaded in three-point loading and designed to have the same initial stiffness of cross section. To simulate the wheel cyclic load, different maximum loads were selected, but the minimum load was the same for all slabs. At the same maximum load of 1.76 static wheel loads, the stiffness degradation and crack width in the SFCB slab were similar to those of the traditional RC slab and survived 3,000,000 fatigue cycles, showing good fatigue performance and a residual strength reduction of only approximately 3%. At the maximum load level of 60% of the ultimate load static capacity, both the SFCB slab and RC slab could satisfy the requirements of 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, whereas the stress in SFCB was only approximately 66% of the steel bar, and the crack width in the SFCB slab was 1.15 times greater than that in the RC slab. After 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, the maximum load level was increased to approximately 65% of the ultimate load static capacity. The stiffness of the RC slab decreased by 21% and was close to failure, whereas the SFCB slab only decreased by 6%. Finally, the BFRP slab had the shortest fatigue life (only 1,600,000 cycles) with a maximum load of only 52% of the ultimate load static capacity owing to the possibly reduced bond strength between concrete and BFRPs.
    • Download: (1.582Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Fatigue Performance of Ballastless Track Slabs Reinforced with BFRP and SFCB

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245383
    Collections
    • Journal of Composites for Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYang Yang
    contributor authorGang Wu
    contributor authorZhi-Shen Wu
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:46Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:04:46Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000728.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245383
    description abstractThe main objective of this research was to evaluate the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bar-reinforced ballastless track slab subjected to a fatigue loading. Five ballastless track slabs were experimentally tested, which were reinforced with steel fiber–reinforced polymer composite bars (SFCBs), basalt fiber–reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars, and traditional steel bars, respectively. All slabs were loaded in three-point loading and designed to have the same initial stiffness of cross section. To simulate the wheel cyclic load, different maximum loads were selected, but the minimum load was the same for all slabs. At the same maximum load of 1.76 static wheel loads, the stiffness degradation and crack width in the SFCB slab were similar to those of the traditional RC slab and survived 3,000,000 fatigue cycles, showing good fatigue performance and a residual strength reduction of only approximately 3%. At the maximum load level of 60% of the ultimate load static capacity, both the SFCB slab and RC slab could satisfy the requirements of 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, whereas the stress in SFCB was only approximately 66% of the steel bar, and the crack width in the SFCB slab was 1.15 times greater than that in the RC slab. After 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, the maximum load level was increased to approximately 65% of the ultimate load static capacity. The stiffness of the RC slab decreased by 21% and was close to failure, whereas the SFCB slab only decreased by 6%. Finally, the BFRP slab had the shortest fatigue life (only 1,600,000 cycles) with a maximum load of only 52% of the ultimate load static capacity owing to the possibly reduced bond strength between concrete and BFRPs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFatigue Performance of Ballastless Track Slabs Reinforced with BFRP and SFCB
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000728
    page04016069
    treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian