Show simple item record

contributor authorPu Zhang
contributor authorHong Zhu
contributor authorGang Wu
contributor authorShao-Ping Meng
contributor authorZhi-Shen Wu
date accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:37Z
date available2017-12-30T13:04:37Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000666.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245352
description abstractThe mechanical performance of four types of interfaces between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plate and concrete was compared by double-lap-shear test. The study found that the failure characteristics of the four interfaces are obviously distinct. Among them, the shear capacity load of the shear key combined with wet-bond (SK-WB) interface was the highest, followed by the dry-bond and the coarse-aggregate-coating (CAC) interfaces; the wet-bond interface had the lowest shear load bearing capacity. The type of the resin used for the wet-bond adhesive has a slight influence on the bond strength, whereas the type of the resin used for the shear key bonding has a much more significant effect on the shear capacity load of these interfaces. The thickness of the wet-bond epoxy resin layer also has a significant impact on the bond performance of the wet-bond interface. The shear key forms has less influence when the flexural stiffness of the shear keys itself is sufficient; the load capacity of the SK-WB interface is often dependent on the bonding area between the shear key and the concrete. The concept of bond zone was put out when creating interface model of the SK-WB interface. Finally, unified form formulas of the shear capacity and the interface fracture energy are provided for the different interfaces, and the values of them are estimated.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleShear Capacity Comparison of Four Different Composite Interfaces between FRP Plates and Concrete Substrate
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000666
page04016006
treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record