YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Quest for a New Solver for EPANET 2

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Gregor Burger
    ,
    Robert Sitzenfrei
    ,
    Manfred Kleidorfer
    ,
    Wolfgang Rauch
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000596
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the best known hydraulic water distribution modeling toolkits that is most used by both researchers and practitioners is EPANET 2. Initially the authors aimed to speed up such simulations by utilizing modern multicore processors in the code implementation. The 30-year-old linear solver was replaced in steps by seven different modern multicore capable solvers. Subsequently, speedup tests were carried out with small- (up to 1.6×103 nodes), medium- (up to 6.3×104 nodes) and large-sized (up to 6.3×105 nodes) test cases. None of the tested solvers was found to perform faster than the original solver for networks with a real-world character, although two solvers showed a speedup on medium and large water distribution networks. This is an example that strategies to reduce computation time can produce promising results in a theoretic research environment, but fail in practical engineering applications. Likewise, this paper highlights again the importance of considering realistic test cases during the implementation phase. Further, the authors point out why the different tested strategies in this work have not succeeded. Although two other issues (implemented hash table and node reordering) could be identified for potential improvement of the code, it was concluded that the original solver is still the fastest for practical system configurations.
    • Download: (5.265Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Quest for a New Solver for EPANET 2

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244837
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGregor Burger
    contributor authorRobert Sitzenfrei
    contributor authorManfred Kleidorfer
    contributor authorWolfgang Rauch
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:02:16Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:02:16Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000596.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244837
    description abstractOne of the best known hydraulic water distribution modeling toolkits that is most used by both researchers and practitioners is EPANET 2. Initially the authors aimed to speed up such simulations by utilizing modern multicore processors in the code implementation. The 30-year-old linear solver was replaced in steps by seven different modern multicore capable solvers. Subsequently, speedup tests were carried out with small- (up to 1.6×103 nodes), medium- (up to 6.3×104 nodes) and large-sized (up to 6.3×105 nodes) test cases. None of the tested solvers was found to perform faster than the original solver for networks with a real-world character, although two solvers showed a speedup on medium and large water distribution networks. This is an example that strategies to reduce computation time can produce promising results in a theoretic research environment, but fail in practical engineering applications. Likewise, this paper highlights again the importance of considering realistic test cases during the implementation phase. Further, the authors point out why the different tested strategies in this work have not succeeded. Although two other issues (implemented hash table and node reordering) could be identified for potential improvement of the code, it was concluded that the original solver is still the fastest for practical system configurations.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleQuest for a New Solver for EPANET 2
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000596
    page04015065
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian