YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Nutrient Leaching and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grassed Detention and Bioretention Stormwater Basins

    Source: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2018:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Lauren McPhillips
    ,
    Christine Goodale
    ,
    M. Todd Walter
    DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000837
    Abstract: Nutrient cycling was compared in a grassed detention basin and a bioretention basin was amended with compost, mulch, and diverse plantings. The authors monitored dissolved nutrients in basin inflows and outflows and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from basin soils. Few previous studies have evaluated GHGs in stormwater control measures, and none to the authors’ knowledge have quantified GHGs along with nutrient leaching. Although these basins are intended to improve runoff quality, the bioretention basin was a source of nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). SRP and DOC leaching was driven by high phosphorous (P) and carbon (C) content of the bioretention soil media, and nitrate leaching was driven by the low C∶N of added compost. Emissions of N2O and CH4 were low from both basins, although there were periodically high N2O emission rates at both sites. CO2 emissions were greater from the bioretention basin, where soil C content was greater. Looking at bioretention design standards, organic matter (OM) recommendations are quite varied. Based on the results from this study, bioretention basin design should minimize OM additions to soil media and choose OM with high C∶N (>20) and low P content to minimize availability of excess nutrients for leaching or GHG production.
    • Download: (638.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Nutrient Leaching and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grassed Detention and Bioretention Stormwater Basins

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244652
    Collections
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLauren McPhillips
    contributor authorChristine Goodale
    contributor authorM. Todd Walter
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:01:26Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:01:26Z
    date issued2018
    identifier otherJSWBAY.0000837.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244652
    description abstractNutrient cycling was compared in a grassed detention basin and a bioretention basin was amended with compost, mulch, and diverse plantings. The authors monitored dissolved nutrients in basin inflows and outflows and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from basin soils. Few previous studies have evaluated GHGs in stormwater control measures, and none to the authors’ knowledge have quantified GHGs along with nutrient leaching. Although these basins are intended to improve runoff quality, the bioretention basin was a source of nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). SRP and DOC leaching was driven by high phosphorous (P) and carbon (C) content of the bioretention soil media, and nitrate leaching was driven by the low C∶N of added compost. Emissions of N2O and CH4 were low from both basins, although there were periodically high N2O emission rates at both sites. CO2 emissions were greater from the bioretention basin, where soil C content was greater. Looking at bioretention design standards, organic matter (OM) recommendations are quite varied. Based on the results from this study, bioretention basin design should minimize OM additions to soil media and choose OM with high C∶N (>20) and low P content to minimize availability of excess nutrients for leaching or GHG production.
    titleNutrient Leaching and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grassed Detention and Bioretention Stormwater Basins
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    identifier doi10.1061/JSWBAY.0000837
    page04017014
    treeJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2018:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian