Morphological Analysis for Architectural Applications: Comparison between Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion PhotogrammetrySource: Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000172Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and structure-from-motion photogrammetry (SfM) can both provide dense and accurate point clouds. Therefore, they can be used to perform a morphological analysis of the façades of a masonry building, which relies on evaluation of the differences between the point cloud and a reference regular surface fitted to it. To compare TLS and SfM performance in morphological analysis, multimodal surveys were carried out on the square cross-section, 48-m-high Garisenda Tower in Bologna, Italy (reference surface: plane), and the circle cross-section, 42-m-high Caorle’s leaning bell tower in Venice, Italy (reference surface: moving cylinder). The results show that the TLS- and SfM-based morphologies are qualitatively the same, and the relative differences are lower than 10%–20% under the condition that the viewpoint positions (VPs) are optimal. Also, the overall geometries are correctly described by both the techniques. The main conclusion is that, if no particular constraints exist (e.g., unavoidable suboptimal VPs, night surveys are needed, or trees hide the surface), TLS and SfM have similar performance in morphological analysis.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Giordano Teza | |
contributor author | Arianna Pesci | |
contributor author | Andrea Ninfo | |
date accessioned | 2017-12-30T13:01:22Z | |
date available | 2017-12-30T13:01:22Z | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier other | %28ASCE%29SU.1943-5428.0000172.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244632 | |
description abstract | Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and structure-from-motion photogrammetry (SfM) can both provide dense and accurate point clouds. Therefore, they can be used to perform a morphological analysis of the façades of a masonry building, which relies on evaluation of the differences between the point cloud and a reference regular surface fitted to it. To compare TLS and SfM performance in morphological analysis, multimodal surveys were carried out on the square cross-section, 48-m-high Garisenda Tower in Bologna, Italy (reference surface: plane), and the circle cross-section, 42-m-high Caorle’s leaning bell tower in Venice, Italy (reference surface: moving cylinder). The results show that the TLS- and SfM-based morphologies are qualitatively the same, and the relative differences are lower than 10%–20% under the condition that the viewpoint positions (VPs) are optimal. Also, the overall geometries are correctly described by both the techniques. The main conclusion is that, if no particular constraints exist (e.g., unavoidable suboptimal VPs, night surveys are needed, or trees hide the surface), TLS and SfM have similar performance in morphological analysis. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Morphological Analysis for Architectural Applications: Comparison between Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 142 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Surveying Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000172 | |
page | 04016004 | |
tree | Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |