YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Continuous One-Way RC Slabs with Sinking Outer Support: Tests and Simple Model

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    N. Stathas
    ,
    S. N. Bousias
    ,
    X. Palios
    ,
    E. Strepelias
    ,
    M. N. Fardis
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001887
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Tests were carried out on two continuous one-way slab specimens, representing, at a scale of 1:1.5, the floor slabs of a multistory building most affected by a postulated instant loss of a perimeter column owing to accidental loading. The bottom bars in the first specimen were discontinuous over the central support, and top reinforcement extended only over the supports. In the second specimen, reinforcing bars were continuous from one outer support to the other on both faces of the slab. Thanks to the membrane action due to the horizontal restraint by the rest of the floor system, both specimens—especially the one with continuous top bars—sustained the distributed load of the slab plus a line load along the sinking outer support of 10  kN/m without collapse in full scale, with settlement of that support as high as 0.5 m. The main features of the force-deformation behavior can be captured by a simple, hand-calculation model, taking into account geometric nonlinearities, including large deformations. Model predictions compare best with test results when tension stiffening is neglected; moreover, they are not very sensitive to the exact location where the slab first cracks or develops the critical plastic hinge. Test results were combined with those of the perimeter beams on which the slabs are supported to estimate the margin of bearing capacity of these beams over and above self weight, finishings, and quasipermanent loads on the slab. Membrane action in the slab seems to become a prime player in the global response to the loss of a perimeter column when the beam’s flexural mechanism and arch action are past their peak resistance. The slab’s membrane mechanism, together with the arch and catenary actions that develop at the edge beam in the transverse direction when the full structure is considered, are important for maintaining the capacity margin close to its peak value at larger beam deflections. This is better achieved if the slab is reinforced throughout its top surface.
    • Download: (2.131Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Continuous One-Way RC Slabs with Sinking Outer Support: Tests and Simple Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244577
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorN. Stathas
    contributor authorS. N. Bousias
    contributor authorX. Palios
    contributor authorE. Strepelias
    contributor authorM. N. Fardis
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:01:09Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:01:09Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001887.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244577
    description abstractTests were carried out on two continuous one-way slab specimens, representing, at a scale of 1:1.5, the floor slabs of a multistory building most affected by a postulated instant loss of a perimeter column owing to accidental loading. The bottom bars in the first specimen were discontinuous over the central support, and top reinforcement extended only over the supports. In the second specimen, reinforcing bars were continuous from one outer support to the other on both faces of the slab. Thanks to the membrane action due to the horizontal restraint by the rest of the floor system, both specimens—especially the one with continuous top bars—sustained the distributed load of the slab plus a line load along the sinking outer support of 10  kN/m without collapse in full scale, with settlement of that support as high as 0.5 m. The main features of the force-deformation behavior can be captured by a simple, hand-calculation model, taking into account geometric nonlinearities, including large deformations. Model predictions compare best with test results when tension stiffening is neglected; moreover, they are not very sensitive to the exact location where the slab first cracks or develops the critical plastic hinge. Test results were combined with those of the perimeter beams on which the slabs are supported to estimate the margin of bearing capacity of these beams over and above self weight, finishings, and quasipermanent loads on the slab. Membrane action in the slab seems to become a prime player in the global response to the loss of a perimeter column when the beam’s flexural mechanism and arch action are past their peak resistance. The slab’s membrane mechanism, together with the arch and catenary actions that develop at the edge beam in the transverse direction when the full structure is considered, are important for maintaining the capacity margin close to its peak value at larger beam deflections. This is better achieved if the slab is reinforced throughout its top surface.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleContinuous One-Way RC Slabs with Sinking Outer Support: Tests and Simple Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001887
    page04017194
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian