YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Response Evaluation of Ductile Reinforced Concrete Block Structural Walls. I: Experimental Results and Force-Based Design Parameters

    Source: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2016:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Mustafa A. Siyam
    ,
    Wael W. El-Dakhakhni
    ,
    Marwan T. Shedid
    ,
    Robert G. Drysdale
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000794
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The reported experimental study documents the performance of six fully grouted reinforced concrete block structural walls tested under quasistatic cyclic loading. The walls fall under the ductile shear walls and the special reinforced masonry walls seismic force resisting system (SFRS) classification of the Canadian and U.S. standards, respectively. The test matrix consisted of one rectangular, one flanged, and two slab-coupled walls, all with an overall aspect ratio of 1.4. In addition, two rectangular walls, representing the individual components of the slab-coupled wall systems, were tested to quantify the wall slab coupling effects. In addition to discussing the experimental results, the study also presents key force-based seismic design (FBSD) parameters, such as the wall lateral load capacity, plastic hinge length, wall failure modes, and displacement ductility capacities. Moreover, the effects of wall cross-sectional configuration and slab coupling on the cyclic response and deformation capabilities of the walls are discussed. In general, the yield and ultimate loads were found to be accurately predicted using the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S304-14 and Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) formulations. The wall experimental displacement ductility values (calculated at 20% strength degradation) ranged between 5.4 and 7.6, whereas the idealized displacement ductility values at the same strength degradation level ranged between 3.4 and 5.4. The analysis results reported in the paper highlight the fact that walls designed and detailed within the same SFRS classification possess significantly different FBSD parameters. The results also indicate that slab coupling, although not recognized as a wall coupling mechanism in the current editions of the CSA and MSJC, can have significant influences on the seismic response of ductile/special reinforced masonry wall systems.
    • Download: (14.14Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Seismic Response Evaluation of Ductile Reinforced Concrete Block Structural Walls. I: Experimental Results and Force-Based Design Parameters

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244124
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMustafa A. Siyam
    contributor authorWael W. El-Dakhakhni
    contributor authorMarwan T. Shedid
    contributor authorRobert G. Drysdale
    date accessioned2017-12-30T12:58:48Z
    date available2017-12-30T12:58:48Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CF.1943-5509.0000794.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244124
    description abstractThe reported experimental study documents the performance of six fully grouted reinforced concrete block structural walls tested under quasistatic cyclic loading. The walls fall under the ductile shear walls and the special reinforced masonry walls seismic force resisting system (SFRS) classification of the Canadian and U.S. standards, respectively. The test matrix consisted of one rectangular, one flanged, and two slab-coupled walls, all with an overall aspect ratio of 1.4. In addition, two rectangular walls, representing the individual components of the slab-coupled wall systems, were tested to quantify the wall slab coupling effects. In addition to discussing the experimental results, the study also presents key force-based seismic design (FBSD) parameters, such as the wall lateral load capacity, plastic hinge length, wall failure modes, and displacement ductility capacities. Moreover, the effects of wall cross-sectional configuration and slab coupling on the cyclic response and deformation capabilities of the walls are discussed. In general, the yield and ultimate loads were found to be accurately predicted using the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S304-14 and Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) formulations. The wall experimental displacement ductility values (calculated at 20% strength degradation) ranged between 5.4 and 7.6, whereas the idealized displacement ductility values at the same strength degradation level ranged between 3.4 and 5.4. The analysis results reported in the paper highlight the fact that walls designed and detailed within the same SFRS classification possess significantly different FBSD parameters. The results also indicate that slab coupling, although not recognized as a wall coupling mechanism in the current editions of the CSA and MSJC, can have significant influences on the seismic response of ductile/special reinforced masonry wall systems.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSeismic Response Evaluation of Ductile Reinforced Concrete Block Structural Walls. I: Experimental Results and Force-Based Design Parameters
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000794
    page04015066
    treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2016:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian