YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Forecasting Evaporative Loss by Least-Square Support-Vector Regression and Evaluation with Genetic Programming, Gaussian Process, and Minimax Probability Machine Regression: Case Study of Brisbane City

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Ravinesh C. Deo
    ,
    Pijush Samui
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001506
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Daily evaporative loss (Ep) forecasting models are decisive tools with potential applications in hydrology, the design of water systems, urban water assessments, and irrigation management. This paper performs a case study for forecasting daily Ep for Brisbane city using least-square support-vector regression (LSSVR). A limited set of predictor data with solar radiation and exposure, maximum/minimum temperatures, wind speed, and precipitation (March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015) is adopted to develop the predictive model. The results are evaluated with Gaussian process regression (GPR), minimax probability machine regression (MPMR), and genetic programming (GP) models. In the testing phase, a correlation coefficient of 0.895 is attained between the observed and forecasted Ep by LSSVR that contrasted 0.875 (GPR), 0.864 (MPMR), and 0.628 (GP). A sensitivity test of predictor variables shows that approximately 28.5% of features are extracted from solar radiation data with 18.1% (wind speed), 16.6% (precipitation), and 10–15% (minimum and maximum temperature). The root-mean square error for LSSVR is lower than the GPR, MPMR, and GP models by 16.2, 11.4, and 79.4%, and the cumulative frequency of forecasting error attained for LSSVR is the highest within the smallest error band. The results confirm the better utility of LSSVR in relation to GP, GPR, and MPMR models for forecasting daily evaporative loss.
    • Download: (1.220Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Forecasting Evaporative Loss by Least-Square Support-Vector Regression and Evaluation with Genetic Programming, Gaussian Process, and Minimax Probability Machine Regression: Case Study of Brisbane City

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243595
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRavinesh C. Deo
    contributor authorPijush Samui
    date accessioned2017-12-30T12:56:08Z
    date available2017-12-30T12:56:08Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001506.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243595
    description abstractDaily evaporative loss (Ep) forecasting models are decisive tools with potential applications in hydrology, the design of water systems, urban water assessments, and irrigation management. This paper performs a case study for forecasting daily Ep for Brisbane city using least-square support-vector regression (LSSVR). A limited set of predictor data with solar radiation and exposure, maximum/minimum temperatures, wind speed, and precipitation (March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015) is adopted to develop the predictive model. The results are evaluated with Gaussian process regression (GPR), minimax probability machine regression (MPMR), and genetic programming (GP) models. In the testing phase, a correlation coefficient of 0.895 is attained between the observed and forecasted Ep by LSSVR that contrasted 0.875 (GPR), 0.864 (MPMR), and 0.628 (GP). A sensitivity test of predictor variables shows that approximately 28.5% of features are extracted from solar radiation data with 18.1% (wind speed), 16.6% (precipitation), and 10–15% (minimum and maximum temperature). The root-mean square error for LSSVR is lower than the GPR, MPMR, and GP models by 16.2, 11.4, and 79.4%, and the cumulative frequency of forecasting error attained for LSSVR is the highest within the smallest error band. The results confirm the better utility of LSSVR in relation to GP, GPR, and MPMR models for forecasting daily evaporative loss.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleForecasting Evaporative Loss by Least-Square Support-Vector Regression and Evaluation with Genetic Programming, Gaussian Process, and Minimax Probability Machine Regression: Case Study of Brisbane City
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume22
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001506
    page05017003
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian