YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Unitary Framework for Hydraulic Mathematical Models of Transient Cavitation in Pipes: Numerical Analysis of 1D and 2D Flow

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    G. Pezzinga
    ,
    V. C. Santoro
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001384
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper deals with two-phase flow models of transient cavitating pipe flow, showing how bubble-flow models and shallow-water models can be considered in a unitary framework by only changing the geometry of the cross section. A bubble-flow cavitation model and a shallow-water cavitation model are proposed, taking into account the convective terms. Computational results are compared with those of two previous simpler bubble-flow models and with experimental measurements reported in the literature. Both quasi-steady one-dimensional (1D) and quasi-two-dimensional (2D) forms of all models are considered. For the examined cases, numerical analysis shows that 1D models converge for similar grid resolution; 2D models reach convergence with coarser longitudinal grids than, or at most with same grids as, 1D models. Comparison with measurements reveals that in order to properly investigate the capabilities of models, the computation must proceed way in time. Indeed, the first cavitation event (or, in some cases, the first few cavitation events) is very well reproduced with all models, both 1D and 2D, but over time remarkable differences in numerical results can be observed. The 1D models overestimate head values, generally do not reproduce well the shape of the function, and are delayed in time with respect to measurements, whereas 2D models reproduce very well the peaks and shapes of the head as function of time, but their results are anticipated in time with respect to measurements, suggesting that energy dissipation is overestimated. The comparison of results of the different 2D models shows, for the examined cases, very small differences, justifying the adoption of simpler models.
    • Download: (1.763Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Unitary Framework for Hydraulic Mathematical Models of Transient Cavitation in Pipes: Numerical Analysis of 1D and 2D Flow

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243500
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorG. Pezzinga
    contributor authorV. C. Santoro
    date accessioned2017-12-30T12:55:37Z
    date available2017-12-30T12:55:37Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001384.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243500
    description abstractThis paper deals with two-phase flow models of transient cavitating pipe flow, showing how bubble-flow models and shallow-water models can be considered in a unitary framework by only changing the geometry of the cross section. A bubble-flow cavitation model and a shallow-water cavitation model are proposed, taking into account the convective terms. Computational results are compared with those of two previous simpler bubble-flow models and with experimental measurements reported in the literature. Both quasi-steady one-dimensional (1D) and quasi-two-dimensional (2D) forms of all models are considered. For the examined cases, numerical analysis shows that 1D models converge for similar grid resolution; 2D models reach convergence with coarser longitudinal grids than, or at most with same grids as, 1D models. Comparison with measurements reveals that in order to properly investigate the capabilities of models, the computation must proceed way in time. Indeed, the first cavitation event (or, in some cases, the first few cavitation events) is very well reproduced with all models, both 1D and 2D, but over time remarkable differences in numerical results can be observed. The 1D models overestimate head values, generally do not reproduce well the shape of the function, and are delayed in time with respect to measurements, whereas 2D models reproduce very well the peaks and shapes of the head as function of time, but their results are anticipated in time with respect to measurements, suggesting that energy dissipation is overestimated. The comparison of results of the different 2D models shows, for the examined cases, very small differences, justifying the adoption of simpler models.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleUnitary Framework for Hydraulic Mathematical Models of Transient Cavitation in Pipes: Numerical Analysis of 1D and 2D Flow
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001384
    page04017053
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian