Show simple item record

contributor authorMandar Dewoolkar
contributor authorJay Hargy
contributor authorIan Anderson
contributor authorPedro de Alba
contributor authorScott M. Olson
date accessioned2017-12-30T12:54:45Z
date available2017-12-30T12:54:45Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001374.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243306
description abstractSeismic design of geotechnical structures often requires estimates of how shearing resistance of liquefiable soil is reduced to its minimum value (residual strength, sr) as pore pressures build up and is subsequently regained as pore pressures dissipate. It was envisioned that the shear strength of liquefying sands could be measured in-flight in a seismic geotechnical centrifuge model by pulling thin coupons (plates) horizontally through the sand models before, during, and after shaking to simulate the large strains and strain rates associated with liquefaction flow failures. This paper presents the results of seismic centrifuge tests that were used to make such measurements. Companion ring shear (RS) tests also are described. Although centrifuge and RS residual strengths were generally similar and increased with relative density, the centrifuge sr and sr/σvo′ (sr divided by preshaking effective vertical stress) increased significantly with small changes in relative density, while the RS test sr and sr/σvo′ increased only slightly with changes in relative density. Furthermore, many measured sr and sr/σvo′ values fell below penetration test-based design curves used in practice. Dilative tendency during shearing is believed to have resulted in a dramatic increase in sr and sr/σvo′ in the centrifuge tests that consisted of soil dense of the critical state. In contrast, RS tests likely resulted in shear band development, where intense shearing and particle damage occurs, leading to suppressed soil dilative tendency and divergence from the centrifuge test results at higher relative densities. The centrifuge tests provided evidence that, as expected, postliquefaction strength recovery is linearly proportional to effective stress as excess pore pressures dissipate.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResidual and Postliquefaction Strength of a Liquefiable Sand
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001374
page04015068
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record