Assessing Alternative Media for Ballasted FlocculationSource: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 011DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001271Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Most current commercial applications of ballasted flocculation use silica sand to increase floc size and density. Other ballast media with different specific gravity may offer advantages such as increased applicable superficial velocity or increased particulate matter removal. This study assessed the relative effect of five ballast media on ballasted flocculation/settling performance: anthracite, recycled crushed glass, conventional silica sand, garnet sand, and magnetite sand, with a common d50 of 150 μm but variable specific densities of 1.45, 2.58, 2.62, 3.93, and 5.08, respectively. Based on microscopic observations and assuming discrete particle removal in an ideal settler, mean superficial media settling velocities were respectively calculated as 35, 73, 74, 122, and 137 m/h. These values do not account for the effect of lamellae or other specific geometries of different patented clarifiers (e.g., CoMag, Densadeg, Sirofloc, and Actiflo). Although the use of magnetite sand allows the total suspended solids load to increase by more than twofold compared to silica sand, the residual turbidity increased after settling as the mixing intensity needed to maintain denser media in suspension was augmented. Consequently, the lowest residual turbidity (0.78 NTU for surface water and 1.38 NTU for wastewater) was observed when anthracite was used as the ballast medium. The ballast media geometry did not significantly affect turbidity removal and settling velocity. Hence, recycled crushed glass was identified as a potential alternative to conventional silica sand despite its higher angularity.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Mathieu Lapointe | |
| contributor author | Catherine Brosseau | |
| contributor author | Yves Comeau | |
| contributor author | Benoit Barbeau | |
| date accessioned | 2017-12-30T12:54:38Z | |
| date available | 2017-12-30T12:54:38Z | |
| date issued | 2017 | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001271.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243271 | |
| description abstract | Most current commercial applications of ballasted flocculation use silica sand to increase floc size and density. Other ballast media with different specific gravity may offer advantages such as increased applicable superficial velocity or increased particulate matter removal. This study assessed the relative effect of five ballast media on ballasted flocculation/settling performance: anthracite, recycled crushed glass, conventional silica sand, garnet sand, and magnetite sand, with a common d50 of 150 μm but variable specific densities of 1.45, 2.58, 2.62, 3.93, and 5.08, respectively. Based on microscopic observations and assuming discrete particle removal in an ideal settler, mean superficial media settling velocities were respectively calculated as 35, 73, 74, 122, and 137 m/h. These values do not account for the effect of lamellae or other specific geometries of different patented clarifiers (e.g., CoMag, Densadeg, Sirofloc, and Actiflo). Although the use of magnetite sand allows the total suspended solids load to increase by more than twofold compared to silica sand, the residual turbidity increased after settling as the mixing intensity needed to maintain denser media in suspension was augmented. Consequently, the lowest residual turbidity (0.78 NTU for surface water and 1.38 NTU for wastewater) was observed when anthracite was used as the ballast medium. The ballast media geometry did not significantly affect turbidity removal and settling velocity. Hence, recycled crushed glass was identified as a potential alternative to conventional silica sand despite its higher angularity. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Assessing Alternative Media for Ballasted Flocculation | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 143 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Environmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001271 | |
| page | 04017071 | |
| tree | Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |