Show simple item record

contributor authorN. Pedroni
contributor authorE. Zio
contributor authorA. Pasanisi
contributor authorM. Couplet
date accessioned2017-12-30T12:54:01Z
date available2017-12-30T12:54:01Z
date issued2016
identifier otherAJRUA6.0000848.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243113
description abstractIn this paper, the authors address the issue of updating in a Bayesian framework, the possibilistic representation of the epistemically uncertain parameters of (aleatory) probability distributions, as new information (e.g., data) becomes available. Two approaches are considered: the first is based on a purely possibilistic counterpart of the classical, well-grounded probabilistic Bayes’ theorem; the second relies on the hybrid combination of (1) fuzzy interval analysis (FIA) to process the uncertainty described by possibility distributions, and (2) repeated Bayesian updating of the uncertainty represented by probability distributions. The feasibility of the two methods is shown on a literature case study involving the risk-based design of a flood protection dike.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEmpirical Comparison of Two Methods for the Bayesian Update of the Parameters of Probability Distributions in a Two-Level Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Uncertainty Framework for Risk Assessment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue1
journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.0000848
page04015015
treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record