YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impact of Statistical Uncertainty on Geotechnical Reliability Estimation

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Jianye Ching
    ,
    Kok Kwang Phoon
    ,
    Shih Hsuan Wu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001075
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Because of limited information in site investigation, it is not possible to obtain the actual values for the trend (t), standard deviation (σ), and scale of fluctuation (δ) of a spatially variable soil property of interest. The uncertainty in these soil parameters θ=(t,σ,δ) is called the statistical uncertainty. The failure probability (pf) of the geotechnical structure will increase as a result of the statistical uncertainty. This paper addresses the issue of incorporating the statistical uncertainty of θ into the reliability calculation, to properly reflect the pf increase. A cone penetration test (CPT) sounding at the Wufeng District in Taichung City (Taiwan) is analyzed to illustrate the importance of treating statistical uncertainty in full and the limitations of the existing point-estimation and detrending approaches. It is shown that the statistical uncertainty can be fully characterized by drawing Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posterior PDF, f(θ|data). The resulting pf estimate will increase if some of these MCMC samples explore the high-risk region. The sample size in a thin soil layer is smaller than that in a thick layer. It follows that statistical uncertainty is larger for thin soil layers. It is also concluded that the point estimate for θ cannot characterize the statistical uncertainty at all, nor can intermediate methods such as detrending first and then drawing MCMC samples from f(σ,δ|t,data) fully characterize the statistical uncertainty.
    • Download: (1.008Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impact of Statistical Uncertainty on Geotechnical Reliability Estimation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243086
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJianye Ching
    contributor authorKok Kwang Phoon
    contributor authorShih Hsuan Wu
    date accessioned2017-12-30T12:53:53Z
    date available2017-12-30T12:53:53Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29EM.1943-7889.0001075.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243086
    description abstractBecause of limited information in site investigation, it is not possible to obtain the actual values for the trend (t), standard deviation (σ), and scale of fluctuation (δ) of a spatially variable soil property of interest. The uncertainty in these soil parameters θ=(t,σ,δ) is called the statistical uncertainty. The failure probability (pf) of the geotechnical structure will increase as a result of the statistical uncertainty. This paper addresses the issue of incorporating the statistical uncertainty of θ into the reliability calculation, to properly reflect the pf increase. A cone penetration test (CPT) sounding at the Wufeng District in Taichung City (Taiwan) is analyzed to illustrate the importance of treating statistical uncertainty in full and the limitations of the existing point-estimation and detrending approaches. It is shown that the statistical uncertainty can be fully characterized by drawing Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posterior PDF, f(θ|data). The resulting pf estimate will increase if some of these MCMC samples explore the high-risk region. The sample size in a thin soil layer is smaller than that in a thick layer. It follows that statistical uncertainty is larger for thin soil layers. It is also concluded that the point estimate for θ cannot characterize the statistical uncertainty at all, nor can intermediate methods such as detrending first and then drawing MCMC samples from f(σ,δ|t,data) fully characterize the statistical uncertainty.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleImpact of Statistical Uncertainty on Geotechnical Reliability Estimation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001075
    page04016027
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian