YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Optimal Hedging Rule for Reservoir Refill

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Wenhua Wan
    ,
    Jianshi Zhao
    ,
    Jay R. Lund
    ,
    Tongtiegang Zhao
    ,
    Xiaohui Lei
    ,
    Hao Wang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000692
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this study, an optimal reservoir refill hedging rule (RHR) is developed under hydrologic uncertainty using a two-stage model. Based on the probability distribution of the maximum refill water availability at the end of refill season, three possible cases exist: unfilled without flood damage, complete filling without flood damage, and complete filling with flood damage. These cases are characterized based on relationships among storage capacity, expected storage buffer, and maximum safe excess discharge. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions for the two-stage model show that the optimal refill operation equates the expected marginal loss of conservation benefit from not complete filling (i.e., ending storage of refill period less than storage capacity) and the expected marginal flood damage from levee overtopping downstream, unless constrained by capacity constraints. A RHR curve, which is analogous to water supply hedging and flood hedging rules, is drawn and shows the trade-off between the two objectives. The optimal refill hedging release decision shows a linear relationship with expected current water availability for a wide range of water conservation benefit functions (linear, concave, or convex). Several operational results are derived. A large downstream flood conveyance capacity and remaining storage capacity allow for a smaller current release and greater storage of water. Relative economic drivers are important; a greater economic potential for flood damage drives a greater release of water in the current stage, and vice versa. Below a critical forecast uncertainty value, improving forecasts reduces the volume of water released, although the opposite effect occurs above this critical value. Finally, the Danjiangkou Reservoir case shows that the RHR, combined with a rolling horizon decision approach, performs better than current rule curves and leads to a gradual dynamic refilling based on forecast information, indicating its potential for practical use.
    • Download: (887.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Optimal Hedging Rule for Reservoir Refill

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242226
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWenhua Wan
    contributor authorJianshi Zhao
    contributor authorJay R. Lund
    contributor authorTongtiegang Zhao
    contributor authorXiaohui Lei
    contributor authorHao Wang
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:23:13Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:23:13Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000692.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242226
    description abstractIn this study, an optimal reservoir refill hedging rule (RHR) is developed under hydrologic uncertainty using a two-stage model. Based on the probability distribution of the maximum refill water availability at the end of refill season, three possible cases exist: unfilled without flood damage, complete filling without flood damage, and complete filling with flood damage. These cases are characterized based on relationships among storage capacity, expected storage buffer, and maximum safe excess discharge. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions for the two-stage model show that the optimal refill operation equates the expected marginal loss of conservation benefit from not complete filling (i.e., ending storage of refill period less than storage capacity) and the expected marginal flood damage from levee overtopping downstream, unless constrained by capacity constraints. A RHR curve, which is analogous to water supply hedging and flood hedging rules, is drawn and shows the trade-off between the two objectives. The optimal refill hedging release decision shows a linear relationship with expected current water availability for a wide range of water conservation benefit functions (linear, concave, or convex). Several operational results are derived. A large downstream flood conveyance capacity and remaining storage capacity allow for a smaller current release and greater storage of water. Relative economic drivers are important; a greater economic potential for flood damage drives a greater release of water in the current stage, and vice versa. Below a critical forecast uncertainty value, improving forecasts reduces the volume of water released, although the opposite effect occurs above this critical value. Finally, the Danjiangkou Reservoir case shows that the RHR, combined with a rolling horizon decision approach, performs better than current rule curves and leads to a gradual dynamic refilling based on forecast information, indicating its potential for practical use.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOptimal Hedging Rule for Reservoir Refill
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000692
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian