Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Motiar Rahman
contributor authorMohan M. Kumaraswamy
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:53Z
date available2017-05-08T21:11:53Z
date copyrightOctober 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A4%28178%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42414
description abstractThis paper focuses on the outcomes of the second survey in a broad Hong Kong-based study on joint risk management (JRM) through relational contracting (RC). The questionnaire survey itself focused on issues relating to the formation of a coalesced team for JRM at the postcontract stage, comprising owners, consultants, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. Results indicate the greater importance of more relational, trust, and joint responsibility-related factors in general, both for selecting different parties and for building a successful relational contract. While some differences in group perceptions emerge, respondents recommend mobilizing project participants at earlier stages of projects, that is, mostly before the contract award, and they strongly support the JRM option for managing various unforeseen risks. Respondents also suggest adjustment/extension of contract provisions for managing unforeseen events, indicating emerging preferences for flexibility in contracts. All these are indicative of a perceived trend toward more RC, teamworking, and collaborative working environments.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePotential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:4(178)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record