YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Pore-Size Distribution of Soils Obtained by Different Methods

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2017:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Min Wang
    ,
    G. N. Pande
    ,
    L. W. Kong
    ,
    Y. T. Feng
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000696
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An average size of pores and pore-size distribution (POSD) is often required for advanced constitutive models for soils adopted for hydro-mechanical-thermal coupled problems. There are a number of methods available for determining POSD, with most requiring specific testing equipment and expertise. In this paper, a comparison is made of POSDs obtained from two different techniques, viz, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and the pressure plate test (PPT). The former requires a specialists’ apparatus not commonly available in soil laboratories and also has safety issues, whereas the latter is more common because it is used to determine soil water retention characteristics of soils. On the basis of certain assumptions, it is demonstrated that POSDs obtained from the two techniques match well and PPT can be used by researchers in soil mechanics to obtain POSD. The range of pore sizes determined by the two techniques is, however, different. Also, the POSD obtained from other soil water retention curve (SWRC) techniques are compared with MIP data. A better correlation between POSDs and SWRCs can be observed.
    • Download: (433.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Pore-Size Distribution of Soils Obtained by Different Methods

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4240146
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMin Wang
    contributor authorG. N. Pande
    contributor authorL. W. Kong
    contributor authorY. T. Feng
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:13:30Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:13:30Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0000696.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4240146
    description abstractAn average size of pores and pore-size distribution (POSD) is often required for advanced constitutive models for soils adopted for hydro-mechanical-thermal coupled problems. There are a number of methods available for determining POSD, with most requiring specific testing equipment and expertise. In this paper, a comparison is made of POSDs obtained from two different techniques, viz, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and the pressure plate test (PPT). The former requires a specialists’ apparatus not commonly available in soil laboratories and also has safety issues, whereas the latter is more common because it is used to determine soil water retention characteristics of soils. On the basis of certain assumptions, it is demonstrated that POSDs obtained from the two techniques match well and PPT can be used by researchers in soil mechanics to obtain POSD. The range of pore sizes determined by the two techniques is, however, different. Also, the POSD obtained from other soil water retention curve (SWRC) techniques are compared with MIP data. A better correlation between POSDs and SWRCs can be observed.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Pore-Size Distribution of Soils Obtained by Different Methods
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue1
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000696
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2017:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian