Show simple item record

contributor authorSamuel Yniesta
contributor authorScott J. Brandenberg
date accessioned2017-12-16T09:11:11Z
date available2017-12-16T09:11:11Z
date issued2017
identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001585.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4239678
description abstractModulus reduction and damping values are commonly plotted against cyclic shear strain amplitude (γc), and the resulting curves are known to depend on mean effective stress (p′), plasticity characteristics, strain rate, and number of loading cycles. The dependence on p′ is potentially problematic for undrained effective stress analysis where excess pore pressure may develop during loading. This paper presents a new concept in which normalized modulus reduction (G/Gmax) and damping (D) values are plotted against stress ratio (η) rather than γc. Relations developed for sand, clay, and peat are found to be essentially pressure-independent when G/Gmax and D−Dmin are plotted versus η,whereas all three are pressure-dependent when plotted versus γc. This finding is potentially useful for undrained effective stress analysis where p′ may change during loading, and provides a new approach for interpreting laboratory tests in future development of G/Gmax and D curves.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStress-Ratio-Based Interpretation of Modulus Reduction and Damping Curves
typeJournal Paper
journal volume143
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001585
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record