YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Steel-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. I: Testing

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Christopher J. Motter
    ,
    David C. Fields
    ,
    John D. Hooper
    ,
    Ron Klemencic
    ,
    John W. Wallace
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001670
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Structural steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) coupling beams are an alternative to conventional and diagonal rebar-reinforced concrete coupling beams. To address gaps in previous testing that was used to develop design recommendations, four large-scale, flexure-yielding, cantilever SRC coupling beams were embedded, without inclusion of auxiliary transfer bars and bearing plates, into reinforced concrete structural walls. Beams were tested by applying quasi-static, reversed-cyclic shear loading to the coupling beam, and moment and shear to the top of the wall to create cyclic tension and compression fields across the embedment region. The primary test variables were the structural steel section embedment length, beam span length (aspect ratio), quantities of wall boundary longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, and applied wall loading (moment, shear, and axial load). Favorable performance, characterized by minimal pinching and asymmetry in the load-deformation response and concentration of damage at the beam–wall interface, was associated with long embedment length, moderate-to-light wall demands, and heavy wall boundary reinforcement. Reduced embedment length, large wall demands, and light wall boundary reinforcement led to reduced performance, with increased pinching, asymmetry, and cyclic degradation evident in the load-deformation response and significant damage in the embedment region.
    • Download: (2.103Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Steel-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. I: Testing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4237091
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChristopher J. Motter
    contributor authorDavid C. Fields
    contributor authorJohn D. Hooper
    contributor authorRon Klemencic
    contributor authorJohn W. Wallace
    date accessioned2017-12-16T08:59:02Z
    date available2017-12-16T08:59:02Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001670.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4237091
    description abstractStructural steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) coupling beams are an alternative to conventional and diagonal rebar-reinforced concrete coupling beams. To address gaps in previous testing that was used to develop design recommendations, four large-scale, flexure-yielding, cantilever SRC coupling beams were embedded, without inclusion of auxiliary transfer bars and bearing plates, into reinforced concrete structural walls. Beams were tested by applying quasi-static, reversed-cyclic shear loading to the coupling beam, and moment and shear to the top of the wall to create cyclic tension and compression fields across the embedment region. The primary test variables were the structural steel section embedment length, beam span length (aspect ratio), quantities of wall boundary longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, and applied wall loading (moment, shear, and axial load). Favorable performance, characterized by minimal pinching and asymmetry in the load-deformation response and concentration of damage at the beam–wall interface, was associated with long embedment length, moderate-to-light wall demands, and heavy wall boundary reinforcement. Reduced embedment length, large wall demands, and light wall boundary reinforcement led to reduced performance, with increased pinching, asymmetry, and cyclic degradation evident in the load-deformation response and significant damage in the embedment region.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSteel-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. I: Testing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001670
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian