Show simple item record

contributor authorRogers, Nathan
contributor authorRen, Zhong
contributor authorBuzzard, Warren
contributor authorSweeney, Brian
contributor authorTinker, Nathan
contributor authorLigrani, Phil
contributor authorHollingsworth, Keith
contributor authorLiberatore, Fred
contributor authorPatel, Rajeshriben
contributor authorHo, Shaun
contributor authorMoon, Hee-Koo
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:51Z
date available2017-11-25T07:19:51Z
date copyright2017/24/1
date issued2017
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_139_05_051009.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4236061
description abstractExperimental results are presented for a double wall cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a combustor liner of a gas turbine engine. The results are collected using a new experimental facility designed to test full-coverage film cooling and impingement cooling effectiveness using either cross flow, impingement, or a combination of both to supply the film cooling flow. The present experiment primarily deals with cross flow supplied full-coverage film cooling for a sparse film cooling hole array that has not been previously tested. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratio of 1, blowing ratios ranging from 2.7 to 7.5, coolant Reynolds numbers based on film cooling hole diameter of about 5000–20,000, and mainstream temperature step during transient tests of 14 °C. The film cooling hole array consists of a film cooling hole diameter of 6.4 mm with nondimensional streamwise (X/de) and spanwise (Y/de) film cooling hole spacing of 15 and 4, respectively. The film cooling holes are streamwise inclined at an angle of 25 deg with respect to the test plate surface and have adjacent streamwise rows staggered with respect to each other. Data illustrating the effects of blowing ratio on adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient are presented. For the arrangement and conditions considered, heat transfer coefficients generally increase with streamwise development and increase with increasing blowing ratio. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness is determined from measurements of adiabatic wall temperature, coolant stagnation temperature, and mainstream recovery temperature. The adiabatic wall temperature and the adiabatic film cooling effectiveness generally decrease and increase, respectively, with streamwise position, and generally decrease and increase, respectively, as blowing ratio becomes larger.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEffects of Double Wall Cooling Configuration and Conditions on Performance of Full-Coverage Effusion Cooling
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4035277
journal fristpage51009
journal lastpage051009-13
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record