Show simple item record

contributor authorCastro-Feliciano, Esteban L.
contributor authorSun, Jing
contributor authorTroesch, Armin W.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:50Z
date available2017-11-25T07:18:50Z
date copyright2016/29/11
date issued2017
identifier issn0892-7219
identifier otheromae_139_01_014501.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235439
description abstractThis paper takes a novel approach to the design of planing craft with active control systems (ACS) by codesigning the longitudinal center of gravity (lcg) and ACS, and compares its performance with a vessel where the lcg and ACS are designed sequentially (traditional approach). The vessels investigated are prismatic in shape. The ACS are modeled as forces on the vessel. The ACS controller is a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) designed using a reduced-order model of the vessel. In the design, only the calm-water drag is optimized. The simulated codesigned vessel had 10% lower calm water and mean seaway drag than the sequentially designed vessel. However, the codesigned vessel's seakeeping was poorer—vertical acceleration doses 25% higher. Results indicate that the traditional sequential design approach does not fully exploit the synergy between a planing craft and its ACS; as a first step, the stability constraints should be relaxed in the design exploration, and the ACS should be considered early in the design stage.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleFirst Step Toward the Codesign of Planing Craft and Active Control Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4034761
journal fristpage14501
journal lastpage014501-8
treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record