Show simple item record

contributor authorTelfer, Scott
contributor authorKindig, Matthew W.
contributor authorSangeorzan, Bruce J.
contributor authorLedoux, William R.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:49Z
date available2017-11-25T07:18:49Z
date copyright2017/23/1
date issued2017
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_139_03_031008.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235430
description abstractPlanus and cavus foot types have been associated with an increased risk of pain and disability. Improving our understanding of the geometric differences between bones in different foot types may provide insights into injury risk profiles and have implications for the design of musculoskeletal and finite-element models. In this study, we performed a geometric morphometric analysis on the geometry of metatarsal bones from 65 feet, segmented from computed tomography (CT) scans. These were categorized into four foot types: pes cavus, neutrally aligned, asymptomatic pes planus, and symptomatic pes planus. Generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) followed by permutation tests was used to determine significant shape differences associated with foot type and sex, and principal component analysis was used to find the modes of variation for each metatarsal. Significant shape differences were found between foot types for all the metatarsals (p < 0.01), most notably in the case of the second metatarsal which showed significant pairwise differences across all the foot types. Analysis of the principal components of variation showed pes cavus bones to have reduced cross-sectional areas in the sagittal and frontal planes. The first (p = 0.02) and fourth metatarsals (p = 0.003) were found to have significant sex-based differences, with first metatarsals from females shown to have reduced width, and fourth metatarsals from females shown to have reduced frontal and sagittal plane cross-sectional areas. Overall, these findings suggest that metatarsal bones have distinct morphological characteristics that are associated with foot type and sex, with implications for our understanding of anatomy and numerical modeling of the foot.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMetatarsal Shape and Foot Type: A Geometric Morphometric Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4035077
journal fristpage31008
journal lastpage031008-8
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record