Show simple item record

contributor authorPiacenza, Joseph R.
contributor authorProper, Scott
contributor authorBozorgirad, Mir Abbas
contributor authorHoyle, Christopher
contributor authorTumer, Irem Y.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:17:53Z
date available2017-11-25T07:17:53Z
date copyright2017/24/3
date issued2017
identifier issn2332-9017
identifier otherrisk_003_02_021006.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234819
description abstractOptimizing the topology of complex infrastructure systems can minimize the impact of cascading failures due to an initiating failure event. This paper presents a model-based design approach for the concept-stage robust design of complex infrastructure systems, as an alternative to modern network analysis methods. This approach focuses on system performance after cascading has occurred and examines design tradeoffs of the resultant (or degraded) system state. In this research, robustness is classically defined as the invariability of system performance due to uncertain failure events, implying that a robust network has the ability to meet minimum performance requirements despite the impact of cascading failures. This research is motivated by catastrophic complex infrastructure system failures such as the August 13th Blackout of 2003, highlighting the vulnerability of systems such as the North American power grid (NAPG). A mathematical model was developed using an adjacency matrix, where removing network connections simulates uncertain failure events. Performance degradation is iteratively calculated as failures cascade throughout the system, and robustness is measured by the lack of performance variability over multiple cascading failure scenarios. Two case studies are provided: an extrapolated IEEE 14 test bus and the Oregon State University (OSU) campus power network. The overarching goal of this research is to understand key system design tradeoffs between robustness, performance objectives, and cost, and explore the benefits of optimizing network topologies during the concept-stage design of these systems (e.g., microgrids).
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleRobust Topology Design of Complex Infrastructure Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal issue2
journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4036152
journal fristpage21006
journal lastpage021006-10
treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2017:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record