YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Long Is Long Enough When Measuring Fluxes and Other Turbulence Statistics?

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1994:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 003::page 661
    Author:
    Lenschow, D. H.
    ,
    Mann, J.
    ,
    Kristensen, L.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0661:HLILEW>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: It is determined how long a time series must be to estimate covariances and moments up to fourth order with a specified statistical significance. For a given averaging time T there is a systematic difference between the true flux or moment and the ensemble average of the time means of the same quantities. This difference, referred to here as the systematic error, is a decreasing function of T tending to zero for T?∞. The variance of the time mean of the flux or moment, the so-called error variance, represents the random scatter of individual realizations, which, when T is much larger than the integral time scale T of the time series, is also a decreasing function of T. This makes it possible to assess the minimum value of T necessary to obtain systematic and random errors smaller than specified values. Assuming that the time series are either Gaussian processes with exponential correlation functions or a skewed process derived from a Gaussian, we obtain expressions for the systematic and random errors. These expressions show that the systematic error and the error variance in the limit of large T are both inversely proportional to T, which means that the random error, that is, the square root of the error variance, will in this limit be larger than the systematic error. It is demonstrated theoretically, as well as experimentally with aircraft data from the convective boundary layer over the ocean and over land, that the assumption that the time series are Gaussian leads to underestimation of the random errors, while derived processes with a more realistic skewness and kurtosis give better estimates. For fluxes, the systematic and random errors are estimated when the time series are sampled instantaneously, but the samples separated in time by an amount ?. It is found that the random error variance and the systematic error increase by less than 8% over continuously sampled data if ? is no larger than the integral scale obtained from the flux time series and the cospectrum, respectively.
    • Download: (987.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Long Is Long Enough When Measuring Fluxes and Other Turbulence Statistics?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4232662
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLenschow, D. H.
    contributor authorMann, J.
    contributor authorKristensen, L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:38:54Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:38:54Z
    date copyright1994/06/01
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-920.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4232662
    description abstractIt is determined how long a time series must be to estimate covariances and moments up to fourth order with a specified statistical significance. For a given averaging time T there is a systematic difference between the true flux or moment and the ensemble average of the time means of the same quantities. This difference, referred to here as the systematic error, is a decreasing function of T tending to zero for T?∞. The variance of the time mean of the flux or moment, the so-called error variance, represents the random scatter of individual realizations, which, when T is much larger than the integral time scale T of the time series, is also a decreasing function of T. This makes it possible to assess the minimum value of T necessary to obtain systematic and random errors smaller than specified values. Assuming that the time series are either Gaussian processes with exponential correlation functions or a skewed process derived from a Gaussian, we obtain expressions for the systematic and random errors. These expressions show that the systematic error and the error variance in the limit of large T are both inversely proportional to T, which means that the random error, that is, the square root of the error variance, will in this limit be larger than the systematic error. It is demonstrated theoretically, as well as experimentally with aircraft data from the convective boundary layer over the ocean and over land, that the assumption that the time series are Gaussian leads to underestimation of the random errors, while derived processes with a more realistic skewness and kurtosis give better estimates. For fluxes, the systematic and random errors are estimated when the time series are sampled instantaneously, but the samples separated in time by an amount ?. It is found that the random error variance and the systematic error increase by less than 8% over continuously sampled data if ? is no larger than the integral scale obtained from the flux time series and the cospectrum, respectively.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleHow Long Is Long Enough When Measuring Fluxes and Other Turbulence Statistics?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume11
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0661:HLILEW>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage661
    journal lastpage673
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1994:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian