YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Investigation of Near-Storm Environments for Tornado Events and Warnings

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2016:;volume( 031 ):;issue: 006::page 1771
    Author:
    Anderson-Frey, Alexandra K.
    ,
    Richardson, Yvette P.
    ,
    Dean, Andrew R.
    ,
    Thompson, Richard L.
    ,
    Smith, Bryan T.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0046.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n this study, a 13-yr climatology of tornado event and warning environments, including metrics of tornado intensity and storm morphology, is investigated with particular focus on the environments of tornadoes associated with quasi-linear convective systems and right-moving supercells. The regions of the environmental parameter space having poor warning performance in various geographical locations, as well as during different times of the day and year, are highlighted. Kernel density estimations of the tornado report and warning environments are produced for two parameter spaces: mixed-layer convective available potential energy (MLCAPE) versus 0?6-km vector shear magnitude (SHR6), and mixed-layer lifting condensation level (MLLCL) versus 0?1-km storm-relative helicity (SRH1). The warning performance is best in environments characteristic of severe convection (i.e., environments featuring large values of MLCAPE and SHR6). For tornadoes occurring during the early evening transition period, MLCAPE is maximized, MLLCL heights decrease, SHR6 and SRH1 increase, tornadoes rated as 2 or greater on the enhanced Fujita scale (EF2+) are most common, the probability of detection is relatively high, and false alarm ratios are relatively low. Overall, the parameter-space distributions of warnings and events are similar; at least in a broad sense, there is no systematic problem with forecasting that explains the high overall false alarm ratio, which instead seems to stem from the inability to know which storms in a given environment will be tornadic.
    • Download: (4.124Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Investigation of Near-Storm Environments for Tornado Events and Warnings

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231995
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAnderson-Frey, Alexandra K.
    contributor authorRichardson, Yvette P.
    contributor authorDean, Andrew R.
    contributor authorThompson, Richard L.
    contributor authorSmith, Bryan T.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:37:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:37:23Z
    date copyright2016/12/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-88237.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231995
    description abstractn this study, a 13-yr climatology of tornado event and warning environments, including metrics of tornado intensity and storm morphology, is investigated with particular focus on the environments of tornadoes associated with quasi-linear convective systems and right-moving supercells. The regions of the environmental parameter space having poor warning performance in various geographical locations, as well as during different times of the day and year, are highlighted. Kernel density estimations of the tornado report and warning environments are produced for two parameter spaces: mixed-layer convective available potential energy (MLCAPE) versus 0?6-km vector shear magnitude (SHR6), and mixed-layer lifting condensation level (MLLCL) versus 0?1-km storm-relative helicity (SRH1). The warning performance is best in environments characteristic of severe convection (i.e., environments featuring large values of MLCAPE and SHR6). For tornadoes occurring during the early evening transition period, MLCAPE is maximized, MLLCL heights decrease, SHR6 and SRH1 increase, tornadoes rated as 2 or greater on the enhanced Fujita scale (EF2+) are most common, the probability of detection is relatively high, and false alarm ratios are relatively low. Overall, the parameter-space distributions of warnings and events are similar; at least in a broad sense, there is no systematic problem with forecasting that explains the high overall false alarm ratio, which instead seems to stem from the inability to know which storms in a given environment will be tornadic.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleInvestigation of Near-Storm Environments for Tornado Events and Warnings
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue6
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-16-0046.1
    journal fristpage1771
    journal lastpage1790
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2016:;volume( 031 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian