YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    WRF Forecasts of Great Plains Nocturnal Low-Level Jet-Driven MCSs. Part II: Differences between Strongly and Weakly Forced Low-Level Jet Environments

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2016:;volume( 031 ):;issue: 005::page 1491
    Author:
    Squitieri, Brian J.
    ,
    Gallus, William A.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-15-0150.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he classic Great Plains southerly low-level jet (LLJ) is a primary factor in sustaining nocturnal convection. This study compares convection-allowing WRF forecasts of LLJ events associated with MCSs in strongly and weakly forced synoptic environments. The depth of the LLJs and magnitude, altitude, and times of the LLJ peak wind were evaluated in observations and WRF forecasts for 31 cases as well as for case subsets of strongly and weakly forced synoptic regimes. LLJs in strongly forced regimes were stronger, deeper, and peaked at higher altitudes and at earlier times compared to weakly forced cases. Mean error MCS-centered composites of WRF forecasts versus RUC analyses were derived at MCS initiation time for the LLJ atmospheric water vapor mixing ratio, LLJ total wind magnitude, convergence, most unstable convective available potential energy (MUCAPE), and most unstable convective inhibition (MUCIN). In most configurations, simulated MCSs in strongly and weakly forced regimes initiated to the north and east of observations, generally in a region where LLJ moisture, MUCAPE, and MUCIN fields were forecast well, with larger errors outside this region. However, WSM6 simulations for strongly forced cases showed a southward displacement in MCS initiation, where a combination of ambient environmental factors and microphysics impacts may simultaneously play a role in the location of forecast MCS initiation. Strongly forced observed and simulated MCSs initiated west of the LLJ axis and moved eastward into the LLJ, while observed and simulated MCSs in weakly forced environments traversed the termini of the LLJ. A northward bias existed for simulated MCS initiation and LLJ termini for weakly forced regimes.
    • Download: (4.374Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      WRF Forecasts of Great Plains Nocturnal Low-Level Jet-Driven MCSs. Part II: Differences between Strongly and Weakly Forced Low-Level Jet Environments

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231950
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSquitieri, Brian J.
    contributor authorGallus, William A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:37:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:37:15Z
    date copyright2016/10/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-88197.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231950
    description abstracthe classic Great Plains southerly low-level jet (LLJ) is a primary factor in sustaining nocturnal convection. This study compares convection-allowing WRF forecasts of LLJ events associated with MCSs in strongly and weakly forced synoptic environments. The depth of the LLJs and magnitude, altitude, and times of the LLJ peak wind were evaluated in observations and WRF forecasts for 31 cases as well as for case subsets of strongly and weakly forced synoptic regimes. LLJs in strongly forced regimes were stronger, deeper, and peaked at higher altitudes and at earlier times compared to weakly forced cases. Mean error MCS-centered composites of WRF forecasts versus RUC analyses were derived at MCS initiation time for the LLJ atmospheric water vapor mixing ratio, LLJ total wind magnitude, convergence, most unstable convective available potential energy (MUCAPE), and most unstable convective inhibition (MUCIN). In most configurations, simulated MCSs in strongly and weakly forced regimes initiated to the north and east of observations, generally in a region where LLJ moisture, MUCAPE, and MUCIN fields were forecast well, with larger errors outside this region. However, WSM6 simulations for strongly forced cases showed a southward displacement in MCS initiation, where a combination of ambient environmental factors and microphysics impacts may simultaneously play a role in the location of forecast MCS initiation. Strongly forced observed and simulated MCSs initiated west of the LLJ axis and moved eastward into the LLJ, while observed and simulated MCSs in weakly forced environments traversed the termini of the LLJ. A northward bias existed for simulated MCS initiation and LLJ termini for weakly forced regimes.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleWRF Forecasts of Great Plains Nocturnal Low-Level Jet-Driven MCSs. Part II: Differences between Strongly and Weakly Forced Low-Level Jet Environments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue5
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-15-0150.1
    journal fristpage1491
    journal lastpage1510
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2016:;volume( 031 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian