YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Incorporating the Effects of Moisture into a Dynamical Parameter: Moist Vorticity and Moist Divergence

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2015:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 006::page 1411
    Author:
    Qian, Weihong
    ,
    Du, Jun
    ,
    Shan, Xiaolong
    ,
    Jiang, Ning
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00154.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: roperly including moisture effects into a dynamical parameter can significantly increase the parameter?s ability to diagnose heavy rain locations. The relative humidity?based weighting approach used to extend the moist potential vorticity (MPV) to the generalized moist potential vorticity (GMPV) is analyzed and demonstrates such an improvement. Following the same approach, two new diagnostic parameters, moist vorticity (MV) and moist divergence (MD), have been proposed in this study by incorporating moisture effects into the traditional vorticity and divergence. A regional heavy rain event that occurred along the Yangtze River on 1 July 1991 is used as a case study, and 41 daily regional heavy rain events during the notorious flooding year of 1998 in eastern China are used for a systematic evaluation. Results show that after the moisture effects were properly incorporated, the improved ability of all three parameters to capture a heavy rain area is significant (statistically at the 99% confidence level): the GMPV is improved over the MPV by 194%, the MD over the divergence by 60%, and the MV over the vorticity by 34% in terms of the threat score (TS). The average TS is 0.270 for the MD, 0.262 for the MV, and 0.188 for the GMPV. Application of the MV and MD to assess heavy rain potential is not intended to replace a complete, multiscale forecasting methodology; however, the results from this study suggest that the MV and MD could be used to postprocess a model forecast to potentially improve heavy rain location predictions.
    • Download: (5.936Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Incorporating the Effects of Moisture into a Dynamical Parameter: Moist Vorticity and Moist Divergence

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231837
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQian, Weihong
    contributor authorDu, Jun
    contributor authorShan, Xiaolong
    contributor authorJiang, Ning
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:36:52Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:36:52Z
    date copyright2015/12/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-88095.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231837
    description abstractroperly including moisture effects into a dynamical parameter can significantly increase the parameter?s ability to diagnose heavy rain locations. The relative humidity?based weighting approach used to extend the moist potential vorticity (MPV) to the generalized moist potential vorticity (GMPV) is analyzed and demonstrates such an improvement. Following the same approach, two new diagnostic parameters, moist vorticity (MV) and moist divergence (MD), have been proposed in this study by incorporating moisture effects into the traditional vorticity and divergence. A regional heavy rain event that occurred along the Yangtze River on 1 July 1991 is used as a case study, and 41 daily regional heavy rain events during the notorious flooding year of 1998 in eastern China are used for a systematic evaluation. Results show that after the moisture effects were properly incorporated, the improved ability of all three parameters to capture a heavy rain area is significant (statistically at the 99% confidence level): the GMPV is improved over the MPV by 194%, the MD over the divergence by 60%, and the MV over the vorticity by 34% in terms of the threat score (TS). The average TS is 0.270 for the MD, 0.262 for the MV, and 0.188 for the GMPV. Application of the MV and MD to assess heavy rain potential is not intended to replace a complete, multiscale forecasting methodology; however, the results from this study suggest that the MV and MD could be used to postprocess a model forecast to potentially improve heavy rain location predictions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleIncorporating the Effects of Moisture into a Dynamical Parameter: Moist Vorticity and Moist Divergence
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue6
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-14-00154.1
    journal fristpage1411
    journal lastpage1428
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2015:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian