Sensitivity of 24-h Forecast Dryline Position and Structure to Boundary Layer Parameterizations in Convection-Allowing WRF Model SimulationsSource: Weather and Forecasting:;2015:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003::page 613Author:Clark, Adam J.
,
Coniglio, Michael C.
,
Coffer, Brice E.
,
Thompson, Greg
,
Xue, Ming
,
Kong, Fanyou
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00078.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: ecent NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments have emphasized the sensitivity of forecast sensible weather fields to how boundary layer processes are represented in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Thus, since 2010, the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms has configured at least three members of their WRF-based Storm-Scale Ensemble Forecast (SSEF) system specifically for examination of sensitivities to parameterizations of turbulent mixing, including the Mellor?Yamada?Janji? (MYJ); quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE); Asymmetrical Convective Model, version 2 (ACM2); Yonsei University (YSU); and Mellor?Yamada?Nakanishi?Niino (MYNN) schemes (hereafter PBL members). In postexperiment analyses, significant differences in forecast boundary layer structure and evolution have been observed, and for preconvective environments MYNN was found to have a superior depiction of temperature and moisture profiles. This study evaluates the 24-h forecast dryline positions in the SSEF system PBL members during the period April?June 2010?12 and documents sensitivities of the vertical distribution of thermodynamic and kinematic variables in near-dryline environments. Main results include the following. Despite having superior temperature and moisture profiles, as indicated by a previous study, MYNN was one of the worst-performing PBL members, exhibiting large eastward errors in forecast dryline position. During April?June 2010?11, a dry bias in the North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) initial conditions largely contributed to eastward dryline errors in all PBL members. An upgrade to the NAM and assimilation system in October 2011 apparently fixed the dry bias, reducing eastward errors. Large sensitivities of CAPE and low-level shear to the PBL schemes were found, which were largest between 1.0° and 3.0° to the east of drylines. Finally, modifications to YSU to decrease vertical mixing and mitigate its warm and dry bias greatly reduced eastward dryline errors.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Clark, Adam J. | |
contributor author | Coniglio, Michael C. | |
contributor author | Coffer, Brice E. | |
contributor author | Thompson, Greg | |
contributor author | Xue, Ming | |
contributor author | Kong, Fanyou | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:36:43Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:36:43Z | |
date copyright | 2015/06/01 | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 0882-8156 | |
identifier other | ams-88055.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231793 | |
description abstract | ecent NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments have emphasized the sensitivity of forecast sensible weather fields to how boundary layer processes are represented in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Thus, since 2010, the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms has configured at least three members of their WRF-based Storm-Scale Ensemble Forecast (SSEF) system specifically for examination of sensitivities to parameterizations of turbulent mixing, including the Mellor?Yamada?Janji? (MYJ); quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE); Asymmetrical Convective Model, version 2 (ACM2); Yonsei University (YSU); and Mellor?Yamada?Nakanishi?Niino (MYNN) schemes (hereafter PBL members). In postexperiment analyses, significant differences in forecast boundary layer structure and evolution have been observed, and for preconvective environments MYNN was found to have a superior depiction of temperature and moisture profiles. This study evaluates the 24-h forecast dryline positions in the SSEF system PBL members during the period April?June 2010?12 and documents sensitivities of the vertical distribution of thermodynamic and kinematic variables in near-dryline environments. Main results include the following. Despite having superior temperature and moisture profiles, as indicated by a previous study, MYNN was one of the worst-performing PBL members, exhibiting large eastward errors in forecast dryline position. During April?June 2010?11, a dry bias in the North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) initial conditions largely contributed to eastward dryline errors in all PBL members. An upgrade to the NAM and assimilation system in October 2011 apparently fixed the dry bias, reducing eastward errors. Large sensitivities of CAPE and low-level shear to the PBL schemes were found, which were largest between 1.0° and 3.0° to the east of drylines. Finally, modifications to YSU to decrease vertical mixing and mitigate its warm and dry bias greatly reduced eastward dryline errors. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Sensitivity of 24-h Forecast Dryline Position and Structure to Boundary Layer Parameterizations in Convection-Allowing WRF Model Simulations | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 30 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Weather and Forecasting | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00078.1 | |
journal fristpage | 613 | |
journal lastpage | 638 | |
tree | Weather and Forecasting:;2015:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |