YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Tornado Warning Decisions Using Phased-Array Radar Data

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2014:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 001::page 57
    Author:
    Heinselman, Pamela
    ,
    LaDue, Daphne
    ,
    Kingfield, Darrel M.
    ,
    Hoffman, Robert
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00042.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he 2012 Phased Array Radar Innovative Sensing Experiment identified how rapidly scanned full-volumetric data captured known mesoscale processes and impacted tornado-warning lead time. Twelve forecasters from nine National Weather Service forecast offices used this rapid-scan phased-array radar (PAR) data to issue tornado warnings on two low-end tornadic and two nontornadic supercell cases. Verification of the tornadic cases revealed that forecasters? use of PAR data provided a median tornado-warning lead time (TLT) of 20 min. This 20-min TLT exceeded by 6.5 and 9 min, respectively, participants? forecast office and regions? median spring season, low-end TLTs (2008?13). Furthermore, polygon-based probability of detection ranged from 0.75 to 1.0 and probability of false alarm for all four cases ranged from 0.0 to 0.5. Similar performance was observed regardless of prior warning experience. Use of a cognitive task analysis method called the recent case walk-through showed that this performance was due to forecasters? use of rapid volumetric updates. Warning decisions were based upon the intensity, persistence, and important changes in features aloft that are precursors to tornadogenesis. Precursors that triggered forecasters? decisions to warn occurred within one or two typical Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scans, indicating PAR?s temporal sampling better matches the time scale at which these precursors evolve.
    • Download: (2.702Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Tornado Warning Decisions Using Phased-Array Radar Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231770
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHeinselman, Pamela
    contributor authorLaDue, Daphne
    contributor authorKingfield, Darrel M.
    contributor authorHoffman, Robert
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:36:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:36:38Z
    date copyright2015/02/01
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-88034.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231770
    description abstracthe 2012 Phased Array Radar Innovative Sensing Experiment identified how rapidly scanned full-volumetric data captured known mesoscale processes and impacted tornado-warning lead time. Twelve forecasters from nine National Weather Service forecast offices used this rapid-scan phased-array radar (PAR) data to issue tornado warnings on two low-end tornadic and two nontornadic supercell cases. Verification of the tornadic cases revealed that forecasters? use of PAR data provided a median tornado-warning lead time (TLT) of 20 min. This 20-min TLT exceeded by 6.5 and 9 min, respectively, participants? forecast office and regions? median spring season, low-end TLTs (2008?13). Furthermore, polygon-based probability of detection ranged from 0.75 to 1.0 and probability of false alarm for all four cases ranged from 0.0 to 0.5. Similar performance was observed regardless of prior warning experience. Use of a cognitive task analysis method called the recent case walk-through showed that this performance was due to forecasters? use of rapid volumetric updates. Warning decisions were based upon the intensity, persistence, and important changes in features aloft that are precursors to tornadogenesis. Precursors that triggered forecasters? decisions to warn occurred within one or two typical Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scans, indicating PAR?s temporal sampling better matches the time scale at which these precursors evolve.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleTornado Warning Decisions Using Phased-Array Radar Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue1
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-14-00042.1
    journal fristpage57
    journal lastpage78
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2014:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian