YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Tools Used for Monitoring and Forecasting Flash Floods in the United States

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2011:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 001::page 158
    Author:
    Gourley, Jonathan J.
    ,
    Erlingis, Jessica M.
    ,
    Hong, Yang
    ,
    Wells, Ernest B.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-10-05043.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: his paper evaluates, for the first time, flash-flood guidance (FFG) values and recently developed gridded FFG (GFFG) used by the National Weather Service (NWS) to monitor and predict imminent flash flooding, which is the leading storm-related cause of death in the United States. It is envisioned that results from this study will be used 1) to establish benchmark performance of existing operational flash-flood prediction tools and 2) to provide information to NWS forecasters that reveals how the existing tools can be readily optimized. Sources used to evaluate the products include official reports of flash floods from the NWS Storm Data database, discharge measurements on small basins available from the U.S. Geological Survey, and witness reports of flash flooding collected during the Severe Hazards Analysis and Verification Experiment. Results indicated that the operational guidance values, with no calibration, were marginally skillful, with the highest critical success index of 0.20 occurring with 3-h GFFG. The false-alarm rates fell and the skill improved to 0.34 when the rainfall was first spatially averaged within basins and then reached 50% of FFG for 1-h accumulation and exceeded 3-h FFG. Although the skill of the GFFG values was generally lower than that of their FFG counterparts, GFFG was capable of detecting the spatial variability of reported flash flooding better than FFG was for a case study in an urban setting.
    • Download: (3.534Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Tools Used for Monitoring and Forecasting Flash Floods in the United States

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231416
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGourley, Jonathan J.
    contributor authorErlingis, Jessica M.
    contributor authorHong, Yang
    contributor authorWells, Ernest B.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:35:27Z
    date copyright2012/02/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-87716.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231416
    description abstracthis paper evaluates, for the first time, flash-flood guidance (FFG) values and recently developed gridded FFG (GFFG) used by the National Weather Service (NWS) to monitor and predict imminent flash flooding, which is the leading storm-related cause of death in the United States. It is envisioned that results from this study will be used 1) to establish benchmark performance of existing operational flash-flood prediction tools and 2) to provide information to NWS forecasters that reveals how the existing tools can be readily optimized. Sources used to evaluate the products include official reports of flash floods from the NWS Storm Data database, discharge measurements on small basins available from the U.S. Geological Survey, and witness reports of flash flooding collected during the Severe Hazards Analysis and Verification Experiment. Results indicated that the operational guidance values, with no calibration, were marginally skillful, with the highest critical success index of 0.20 occurring with 3-h GFFG. The false-alarm rates fell and the skill improved to 0.34 when the rainfall was first spatially averaged within basins and then reached 50% of FFG for 1-h accumulation and exceeded 3-h FFG. Although the skill of the GFFG values was generally lower than that of their FFG counterparts, GFFG was capable of detecting the spatial variability of reported flash flooding better than FFG was for a case study in an urban setting.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluation of Tools Used for Monitoring and Forecasting Flash Floods in the United States
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue1
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-10-05043.1
    journal fristpage158
    journal lastpage173
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2011:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian