YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Influence of Initial Conditions on the WRF–ARW Model QPF Response to Physical Parameterization Changes

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2007:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 003::page 501
    Author:
    Jankov, Isidora
    ,
    Gallus, William A.
    ,
    Segal, Moti
    ,
    Koch, Steven E.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF998.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: To assist in optimizing a mixed-physics ensemble for warm season mesoscale convective system rainfall forecasting, the impact of various physical schemes as well as their interactions on rainfall when different initializations were used has been investigated. For this purpose, high-resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations of eight International H2O Project events were performed. For each case, three different treatments of convection, three different microphysical schemes, and two different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes were used. All cases were initialized with both Local Analyses and Prediction System (LAPS) ?hot? start analyses and 40-km Eta Model analyses. To evaluate the impacts of the variation of two different physical schemes and their interaction on the simulated rainfall under the two different initial conditions, the factor separation method was used. The sensitivity to the use of various physical schemes and their interactions was found to be dependent on the initialization dataset. Runs initialized with Eta analyses appeared to be influenced by the use of the Betts?Miller?Janji? scheme in that model?s assimilation system, which tended to reduce the WRF?s sensitivity to changes in the microphysical scheme compared with that present when LAPS analyses were used for initialization. In addition, differences in initialized thermodynamics resulted in changes in sensitivity to PBL and convective schemes. With both initialization datasets, the greatest sensitivity to the simulated rain rate was due to changes in the convective scheme. However, for rain volume, substantial sensitivity was present due to changes in both the physical parameterizations and the initial datasets.
    • Download: (2.877Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Influence of Initial Conditions on the WRF–ARW Model QPF Response to Physical Parameterization Changes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231382
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJankov, Isidora
    contributor authorGallus, William A.
    contributor authorSegal, Moti
    contributor authorKoch, Steven E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:21Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:35:21Z
    date copyright2007/06/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-87686.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231382
    description abstractTo assist in optimizing a mixed-physics ensemble for warm season mesoscale convective system rainfall forecasting, the impact of various physical schemes as well as their interactions on rainfall when different initializations were used has been investigated. For this purpose, high-resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations of eight International H2O Project events were performed. For each case, three different treatments of convection, three different microphysical schemes, and two different planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes were used. All cases were initialized with both Local Analyses and Prediction System (LAPS) ?hot? start analyses and 40-km Eta Model analyses. To evaluate the impacts of the variation of two different physical schemes and their interaction on the simulated rainfall under the two different initial conditions, the factor separation method was used. The sensitivity to the use of various physical schemes and their interactions was found to be dependent on the initialization dataset. Runs initialized with Eta analyses appeared to be influenced by the use of the Betts?Miller?Janji? scheme in that model?s assimilation system, which tended to reduce the WRF?s sensitivity to changes in the microphysical scheme compared with that present when LAPS analyses were used for initialization. In addition, differences in initialized thermodynamics resulted in changes in sensitivity to PBL and convective schemes. With both initialization datasets, the greatest sensitivity to the simulated rain rate was due to changes in the convective scheme. However, for rain volume, substantial sensitivity was present due to changes in both the physical parameterizations and the initial datasets.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleInfluence of Initial Conditions on the WRF–ARW Model QPF Response to Physical Parameterization Changes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume22
    journal issue3
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF998.1
    journal fristpage501
    journal lastpage519
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2007:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian