YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Validation of Polarimetric Hail Detection

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 005::page 839
    Author:
    Heinselman, Pamela L.
    ,
    Ryzhkov, Alexander V.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF956.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This study describes, illustrates, and validates hail detection by a simplified version of the National Severe Storms Laboratory?s fuzzy logic polarimetric hydrometeor classification algorithm (HCA). The HCA uses four radar variables: reflectivity, differential reflectivity, cross-correlation coefficient, and ?reflectivity texture? to classify echoes as rain mixed with hail, ground clutter?anomalous propagation, biological scatterers (insects, birds, and bats), big drops, light rain, moderate rain, and heavy rain. Diagnostic capabilities of HCA, such as detection of hail, are illustrated for a variety of storm environments using polarimetric radar data collected mostly during the Joint Polarimetric Experiment (JPOLE; 28 April?13 June 2003). Hail classification with the HCA is validated using 47 rain and hail reports collected by storm-intercept teams during JPOLE. For comparison purposes, probability of hail output from the Next-Generation Weather Radar Hail Detection Algorithm (HDA) is validated using the same ground truth. The anticipated polarimetric upgrade of the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler network drives this direct comparison of performance. For the four examined cases, contingency table statistics show that the HCA outperforms the HDA. The superior performance of the HCA results primary from the algorithm?s lack of false alarms compared to the HDA. Statistical significance testing via bootstrapping indicates that differences in the probability of detection and critical success index between the algorithms are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, whereas differences in the false alarm rate and Heidke skill score are statistically significant at the 90% confidence level.
    • Download: (1.138Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Validation of Polarimetric Hail Detection

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231336
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHeinselman, Pamela L.
    contributor authorRyzhkov, Alexander V.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:35:15Z
    date copyright2006/10/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-87644.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231336
    description abstractThis study describes, illustrates, and validates hail detection by a simplified version of the National Severe Storms Laboratory?s fuzzy logic polarimetric hydrometeor classification algorithm (HCA). The HCA uses four radar variables: reflectivity, differential reflectivity, cross-correlation coefficient, and ?reflectivity texture? to classify echoes as rain mixed with hail, ground clutter?anomalous propagation, biological scatterers (insects, birds, and bats), big drops, light rain, moderate rain, and heavy rain. Diagnostic capabilities of HCA, such as detection of hail, are illustrated for a variety of storm environments using polarimetric radar data collected mostly during the Joint Polarimetric Experiment (JPOLE; 28 April?13 June 2003). Hail classification with the HCA is validated using 47 rain and hail reports collected by storm-intercept teams during JPOLE. For comparison purposes, probability of hail output from the Next-Generation Weather Radar Hail Detection Algorithm (HDA) is validated using the same ground truth. The anticipated polarimetric upgrade of the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler network drives this direct comparison of performance. For the four examined cases, contingency table statistics show that the HCA outperforms the HDA. The superior performance of the HCA results primary from the algorithm?s lack of false alarms compared to the HDA. Statistical significance testing via bootstrapping indicates that differences in the probability of detection and critical success index between the algorithms are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, whereas differences in the false alarm rate and Heidke skill score are statistically significant at the 90% confidence level.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleValidation of Polarimetric Hail Detection
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue5
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF956.1
    journal fristpage839
    journal lastpage850
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian