YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Forecasting Tornadic Thunderstorm Potential in Alberta Using Environmental Sounding Data. Part I: Wind Shear and Buoyancy

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 003::page 325
    Author:
    Dupilka, Max L.
    ,
    Reuter, Gerhard W.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF921.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This study investigates, for Alberta, Canada, whether observed sounding parameters such as wind shear and buoyant energy can be used to help distinguish between thunderstorms with significant (F2?F5) tornadoes, thunderstorms with weak (F0?F1) tornadoes, and nontornadic severe thunderstorms. The observational dataset contains 87 severe convective storms, all of which occurred within 200 km of the upper-air site at Stony Plain, Alberta, Canada. Of these storms, 13 spawned significant (F2?F5) tornadoes, 61 spawned weak (F0?F1) tornadoes, and 13 had no reported tornadoes yet produced 3 cm or larger hailstones. The observations suggest that bulk shear contained information about the probability of tornado formation and the intensity of the tornado. Significant tornadic storms tended to have stronger shear values than weak tornadic or nontornadic severe storms. All significant tornado cases had a wind shear magnitude in the 900?500-mb layer exceeding 3 m s?1 km?1. Combining the 900?500-mb shear with the 900?800-mb shear increased the probabilistic guidance for the likelihood of significant tornado occurrence. The data suggest that buoyant energy alone (quantified by the most unstable convective available potential energy) provided no skill in discriminating between tornadic and nontornadic severe storms, or between significant and weak tornadoes.
    • Download: (509.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Forecasting Tornadic Thunderstorm Potential in Alberta Using Environmental Sounding Data. Part I: Wind Shear and Buoyancy

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4231297
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDupilka, Max L.
    contributor authorReuter, Gerhard W.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:08Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:35:08Z
    date copyright2006/06/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-87609.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231297
    description abstractThis study investigates, for Alberta, Canada, whether observed sounding parameters such as wind shear and buoyant energy can be used to help distinguish between thunderstorms with significant (F2?F5) tornadoes, thunderstorms with weak (F0?F1) tornadoes, and nontornadic severe thunderstorms. The observational dataset contains 87 severe convective storms, all of which occurred within 200 km of the upper-air site at Stony Plain, Alberta, Canada. Of these storms, 13 spawned significant (F2?F5) tornadoes, 61 spawned weak (F0?F1) tornadoes, and 13 had no reported tornadoes yet produced 3 cm or larger hailstones. The observations suggest that bulk shear contained information about the probability of tornado formation and the intensity of the tornado. Significant tornadic storms tended to have stronger shear values than weak tornadic or nontornadic severe storms. All significant tornado cases had a wind shear magnitude in the 900?500-mb layer exceeding 3 m s?1 km?1. Combining the 900?500-mb shear with the 900?800-mb shear increased the probabilistic guidance for the likelihood of significant tornado occurrence. The data suggest that buoyant energy alone (quantified by the most unstable convective available potential energy) provided no skill in discriminating between tornadic and nontornadic severe storms, or between significant and weak tornadoes.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleForecasting Tornadic Thunderstorm Potential in Alberta Using Environmental Sounding Data. Part I: Wind Shear and Buoyancy
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue3
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF921.1
    journal fristpage325
    journal lastpage335
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian