Show simple item record

contributor authorMarket, Patrick S.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:05Z
date available2017-06-09T17:35:05Z
date copyright2006/02/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-87593.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231279
description abstractA brief study is provided on the forecast performance of students who write a mock area forecast discussion (AFD) on a weekly basis. Student performance was tracked for one semester (11 weeks) during the University of Missouri?Columbia's local weather forecast game. The hypothesis posed is that student performance is no better on days when they compose an AFD. A nonparametric Mann?Whitney test cannot reject that hypothesis. However, the same test employed on precipitation forecasts (for days when precipitation actually fell) shows that there is a statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) between the scores of those students writing an AFD and those who do not. Similar results are found with a chi-square test. Thus, AFD writers improve their precipitation score on days when significant weather occurred. Forecaster confidence is also enhanced by AFD composition.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Impact of Writing Area Forecast Discussions on Student Forecaster Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue1
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF905.1
journal fristpage104
journal lastpage108
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record