YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Identification of Tropical Cyclone Storm Types Using Crowdsourcing

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010::page 3783
    Author:
    Knapp, Kenneth R.
    ,
    Matthews, Jessica L.
    ,
    Kossin, James P.
    ,
    Hennon, Christopher C.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0022.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he Cyclone Center project maintains a website that allows visitors to answer questions based on tropical cyclone satellite imagery. The goal is to provide a reanalysis of satellite-derived tropical cyclone characteristics from a homogeneous historical database composed of satellite imagery with a common spatial resolution for use in long-term, global analyses. The determination of the cyclone ?type? (curved band, eye, shear, etc.) is a starting point for this process. This analysis shows how multiple classifications of a single image are combined to provide probabilities of a particular image?s type using an expectation?maximization (EM) algorithm. Analysis suggests that the project needs about 10 classifications of an image to adequately determine the storm type. The algorithm is capable of characterizing classifiers with varying levels of expertise, though the project needs about 200 classifications to quantify an individual?s precision. The EM classifications are compared with an objective algorithm, satellite fix data, and the classifications of a known classifier. The EM classifications compare well, with best agreement for eye and embedded center storm types and less agreement for shear and when convection is too weak (termed no-storm images). Both the EM algorithm and the known classifier showed similar tendencies when compared against an objective algorithm. The EM algorithm also fared well when compared to tropical cyclone fix datasets, having higher agreement with embedded centers and less agreement for eye images. The results were used to show the distribution of storm types versus wind speed during a storm?s lifetime.
    • Download: (2.625Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Identification of Tropical Cyclone Storm Types Using Crowdsourcing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4230910
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKnapp, Kenneth R.
    contributor authorMatthews, Jessica L.
    contributor authorKossin, James P.
    contributor authorHennon, Christopher C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:33:48Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:33:48Z
    date copyright2016/10/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-87261.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230910
    description abstracthe Cyclone Center project maintains a website that allows visitors to answer questions based on tropical cyclone satellite imagery. The goal is to provide a reanalysis of satellite-derived tropical cyclone characteristics from a homogeneous historical database composed of satellite imagery with a common spatial resolution for use in long-term, global analyses. The determination of the cyclone ?type? (curved band, eye, shear, etc.) is a starting point for this process. This analysis shows how multiple classifications of a single image are combined to provide probabilities of a particular image?s type using an expectation?maximization (EM) algorithm. Analysis suggests that the project needs about 10 classifications of an image to adequately determine the storm type. The algorithm is capable of characterizing classifiers with varying levels of expertise, though the project needs about 200 classifications to quantify an individual?s precision. The EM classifications are compared with an objective algorithm, satellite fix data, and the classifications of a known classifier. The EM classifications compare well, with best agreement for eye and embedded center storm types and less agreement for shear and when convection is too weak (termed no-storm images). Both the EM algorithm and the known classifier showed similar tendencies when compared against an objective algorithm. The EM algorithm also fared well when compared to tropical cyclone fix datasets, having higher agreement with embedded centers and less agreement for eye images. The results were used to show the distribution of storm types versus wind speed during a storm?s lifetime.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleIdentification of Tropical Cyclone Storm Types Using Crowdsourcing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-16-0022.1
    journal fristpage3783
    journal lastpage3798
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian