An Idealized Study of Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean 4D-Var in the Presence of Model ErrorSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010::page 4007DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0420.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: tmosphere-only and ocean-only variational data assimilation (DA) schemes are able to use window lengths that are optimal for the error growth rate, nonlinearity, and observation density of the respective systems. Typical window lengths are 6?12 h for the atmosphere and 2?10 days for the ocean. However, in the implementation of coupled DA schemes it has been necessary to match the window length of the ocean to that of the atmosphere, which may potentially sacrifice the accuracy of the ocean analysis in order to provide a more balanced coupled state. This paper investigates how extending the window length in the presence of model error affects both the analysis of the coupled state and the initialized forecast when using coupled DA with differing degrees of coupling.Results are illustrated using an idealized single-column model of the coupled atmosphere?ocean system. It is found that the analysis error from an uncoupled DA scheme can be smaller than that from a coupled analysis at the initial time, due to faster error growth in the coupled system. However, this does not necessarily lead to a more accurate forecast due to imbalances in the coupled state. Instead coupled DA is more able to update the initial state to reduce the impact of the model error on the accuracy of the forecast. The effect of model error is potentially most detrimental in the weakly coupled formulation due to the inconsistency between the coupled model used in the outer loop and uncoupled models used in the inner loop.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Fowler, Alison M. | |
| contributor author | Lawless, Amos S. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:33:42Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:33:42Z | |
| date copyright | 2016/10/01 | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
| identifier other | ams-87233.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230880 | |
| description abstract | tmosphere-only and ocean-only variational data assimilation (DA) schemes are able to use window lengths that are optimal for the error growth rate, nonlinearity, and observation density of the respective systems. Typical window lengths are 6?12 h for the atmosphere and 2?10 days for the ocean. However, in the implementation of coupled DA schemes it has been necessary to match the window length of the ocean to that of the atmosphere, which may potentially sacrifice the accuracy of the ocean analysis in order to provide a more balanced coupled state. This paper investigates how extending the window length in the presence of model error affects both the analysis of the coupled state and the initialized forecast when using coupled DA with differing degrees of coupling.Results are illustrated using an idealized single-column model of the coupled atmosphere?ocean system. It is found that the analysis error from an uncoupled DA scheme can be smaller than that from a coupled analysis at the initial time, due to faster error growth in the coupled system. However, this does not necessarily lead to a more accurate forecast due to imbalances in the coupled state. Instead coupled DA is more able to update the initial state to reduce the impact of the model error on the accuracy of the forecast. The effect of model error is potentially most detrimental in the weakly coupled formulation due to the inconsistency between the coupled model used in the outer loop and uncoupled models used in the inner loop. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | An Idealized Study of Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean 4D-Var in the Presence of Model Error | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 144 | |
| journal issue | 10 | |
| journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0420.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 4007 | |
| journal lastpage | 4030 | |
| tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 010 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |