YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of the Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercells Intercepted by VORTEX2 on 10 June 2010

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009::page 3201
    Author:
    Klees, Alicia M.
    ,
    Richardson, Yvette P.
    ,
    Markowski, Paul M.
    ,
    Weiss, Christopher
    ,
    Wurman, Joshua M.
    ,
    Kosiba, Karen K.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0345.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n 10 June 2010, the second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX2) armada collected a rare set of observations of a nontornadic and a tornadic supercell evolving in close proximity to each other. The storms and their environments were analyzed using single- and dual-Doppler radar, mobile mesonet, deployable surface mesonet, and mobile sounding data, with the goal of understanding why one supercell produced no tornadoes while the other produced at least two. Outflow temperature deficits were similar for the two storms, both within the normal range for weakly tornadic supercells but somewhat cold relative to significantly tornadic supercells. The storms formed in a complex environment, with slightly higher storm-relative helicity near the tornadic supercell. The environment evolved significantly in time, with large thermodynamic changes and increases in storm-relative helicity, leading to conditions much more favorable for tornadogenesis. After a few hours, a new storm developed between the supercells, likely leading to the demise of the nontornadic supercell before it was able to experience the enhanced environmental conditions. Two tornadoes developed within the single mesocyclone of the other supercell. After the dissipation of the second tornado, rapid rearward motion of low- to midlevel circulations may have inhibited further tornado production in this storm.
    • Download: (13.98Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of the Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercells Intercepted by VORTEX2 on 10 June 2010

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4230838
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKlees, Alicia M.
    contributor authorRichardson, Yvette P.
    contributor authorMarkowski, Paul M.
    contributor authorWeiss, Christopher
    contributor authorWurman, Joshua M.
    contributor authorKosiba, Karen K.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:33:32Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:33:32Z
    date copyright2016/09/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-87196.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230838
    description abstractn 10 June 2010, the second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX2) armada collected a rare set of observations of a nontornadic and a tornadic supercell evolving in close proximity to each other. The storms and their environments were analyzed using single- and dual-Doppler radar, mobile mesonet, deployable surface mesonet, and mobile sounding data, with the goal of understanding why one supercell produced no tornadoes while the other produced at least two. Outflow temperature deficits were similar for the two storms, both within the normal range for weakly tornadic supercells but somewhat cold relative to significantly tornadic supercells. The storms formed in a complex environment, with slightly higher storm-relative helicity near the tornadic supercell. The environment evolved significantly in time, with large thermodynamic changes and increases in storm-relative helicity, leading to conditions much more favorable for tornadogenesis. After a few hours, a new storm developed between the supercells, likely leading to the demise of the nontornadic supercell before it was able to experience the enhanced environmental conditions. Two tornadoes developed within the single mesocyclone of the other supercell. After the dissipation of the second tornado, rapid rearward motion of low- to midlevel circulations may have inhibited further tornado production in this storm.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of the Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercells Intercepted by VORTEX2 on 10 June 2010
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-15-0345.1
    journal fristpage3201
    journal lastpage3231
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2016:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian