Predictability of Two Types of El Niño Assessed Using an Extended Seasonal Prediction System by MIROCSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2015:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 011::page 4597Author:Imada, Yukiko
,
Tatebe, Hiroaki
,
Ishii, Masayoshi
,
Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu
,
Mori, Masato
,
Arai, Miki
,
Watanabe, Masahiro
,
Kimoto, Masahide
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0007.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: redictability of El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is examined using ensemble hindcasts made with a seasonal prediction system based on the atmosphere and ocean general circulation model, the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, version 5 (MIROC5). Particular attention is paid to differences in predictive skill in terms of the prediction error for two prominent types of El Niño: the conventional eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño and the central Pacific (CP) El Niño, the latter having a maximum warming around the date line. Although the system adopts ocean anomaly assimilation for the initialization process, it maintains a significant ability to predict ENSO with a lead time of more than half a year. This is partly due to the fact that the system is little affected by the ?spring prediction barrier,? because increases in the error have little dependence on the thermocline variability. Composite analyses of each type of El Niño reveal that, compared to EP El Niños, the ability to predict CP El Niños is limited and has a shorter lead time. This is because CP El Niños have relatively small amplitudes, and thus they are more affected by atmospheric noise; this prevents development of oceanic signals that can be used for prediction.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Imada, Yukiko | |
contributor author | Tatebe, Hiroaki | |
contributor author | Ishii, Masayoshi | |
contributor author | Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu | |
contributor author | Mori, Masato | |
contributor author | Arai, Miki | |
contributor author | Watanabe, Masahiro | |
contributor author | Kimoto, Masahide | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:32:55Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:32:55Z | |
date copyright | 2015/11/01 | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-87069.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230697 | |
description abstract | redictability of El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is examined using ensemble hindcasts made with a seasonal prediction system based on the atmosphere and ocean general circulation model, the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, version 5 (MIROC5). Particular attention is paid to differences in predictive skill in terms of the prediction error for two prominent types of El Niño: the conventional eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño and the central Pacific (CP) El Niño, the latter having a maximum warming around the date line. Although the system adopts ocean anomaly assimilation for the initialization process, it maintains a significant ability to predict ENSO with a lead time of more than half a year. This is partly due to the fact that the system is little affected by the ?spring prediction barrier,? because increases in the error have little dependence on the thermocline variability. Composite analyses of each type of El Niño reveal that, compared to EP El Niños, the ability to predict CP El Niños is limited and has a shorter lead time. This is because CP El Niños have relatively small amplitudes, and thus they are more affected by atmospheric noise; this prevents development of oceanic signals that can be used for prediction. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Predictability of Two Types of El Niño Assessed Using an Extended Seasonal Prediction System by MIROC | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 143 | |
journal issue | 11 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0007.1 | |
journal fristpage | 4597 | |
journal lastpage | 4617 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2015:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 011 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |