Show simple item record

contributor authorHendricks, Eric A.
contributor authorPeng, Melinda S.
contributor authorLi, Tim
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:30:49Z
date available2017-06-09T17:30:49Z
date copyright2013/11/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-86529.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230097
description abstracthree different dynamic initialization schemes for tropical cyclone (TC) prediction in numerical prediction systems are described and evaluated. The first scheme involves the removal of the analyzed vortex, followed by the insertion of a dynamically initialized vortex into the model analyses. This scheme is referred to as the tropical cyclone dynamic initialization scheme (TCDI) because the TC component is nudged to the observed surface pressure in an independent three-dimensional primitive equation model prior to insertion. The second scheme is a 12-h relaxation to the analyses' horizontal momentum before the forecast integration begins, and is called the dynamic initialization (DI) scheme. The third scheme is a combination of the previous two schemes, and is called the two-stage dynamic initialization scheme (TCDI/DI). In the first stage, TCDI is implemented in order to improve the representation of the TC vortex. In the second stage, DI is invoked in order to improve the balance between the inserted TC vortex and its environment. All three dynamic initialization schemes are compared with a control (CNTL) scheme, which creates the initial vortex using synthetic TC observations that match the observed intensity and structure in a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) system. The four schemes are tested on 120 cases in the North Atlantic and western North Pacific basins during 2010 and 2011 using the Naval Research Laboratory's TC prediction model: Coupled Ocean?Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System-Tropical Cyclones (COAMPS-TC). It is demonstrated that TCDI/DI performed the best overall with regard to intensity forecasts, reducing the average minimum central pressure error for all lead times by 24.4% compared to the CNTL scheme.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEvaluation of Multiple Dynamic Initialization Schemes for Tropical Cyclone Prediction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue11
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-12-00329.1
journal fristpage4028
journal lastpage4048
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2013:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record