YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sea Surface Temperature–Precipitation Relationship in Different Reanalyses

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2012:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 003::page 1118
    Author:
    Kumar, Arun
    ,
    Zhang, Li
    ,
    Wang, Wanqiu
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00214.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he focus of this investigation is how the relationship at intraseasonal time scales between sea surface temperature and precipitation (SST?P) varies among different reanalyses. The motivation for this work was spurred by a recent report that documented that the SST?P relationship in Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) was much closer to that in the observation than it was for the older generation of reanalyses [i.e., NCEP?NCAR reanalysis (R1) and NCEP?Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis (R2)]. Further, the reason was attributed either to the fact that the CFSR is a partially coupled reanalysis, while R1 and R2 are atmospheric-alone reanalyses, or that R1 and R2 use the observed weekly-averaged SST.The authors repeated the comparison of the SST?P relationship among R1, R2, and CFSR, as well as two recent generations of atmosphere-alone reanalyses, the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim). The results clearly demonstrate that the differences in the SST?P relationship at intraseasonal time scales across different reanalyses are not due to whether the reanalysis system is coupled or atmosphere alone, but are due to the specification of different SSTs. The SST?P relationship in different reanalyses, when computed against a single SST for the benchmark, demonstrates a relationship that is common across all of the reanalyses and observations.
    • Download: (731.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sea Surface Temperature–Precipitation Relationship in Different Reanalyses

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4230014
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKumar, Arun
    contributor authorZhang, Li
    contributor authorWang, Wanqiu
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:30:33Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:30:33Z
    date copyright2013/03/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-86454.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230014
    description abstracthe focus of this investigation is how the relationship at intraseasonal time scales between sea surface temperature and precipitation (SST?P) varies among different reanalyses. The motivation for this work was spurred by a recent report that documented that the SST?P relationship in Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) was much closer to that in the observation than it was for the older generation of reanalyses [i.e., NCEP?NCAR reanalysis (R1) and NCEP?Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis (R2)]. Further, the reason was attributed either to the fact that the CFSR is a partially coupled reanalysis, while R1 and R2 are atmospheric-alone reanalyses, or that R1 and R2 use the observed weekly-averaged SST.The authors repeated the comparison of the SST?P relationship among R1, R2, and CFSR, as well as two recent generations of atmosphere-alone reanalyses, the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim). The results clearly demonstrate that the differences in the SST?P relationship at intraseasonal time scales across different reanalyses are not due to whether the reanalysis system is coupled or atmosphere alone, but are due to the specification of different SSTs. The SST?P relationship in different reanalyses, when computed against a single SST for the benchmark, demonstrates a relationship that is common across all of the reanalyses and observations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSea Surface Temperature–Precipitation Relationship in Different Reanalyses
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue3
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-12-00214.1
    journal fristpage1118
    journal lastpage1123
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2012:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian