Verification of TIGGE Multimodel and ECMWF Reforecast-Calibrated Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts over the Contiguous United States

Abstract

robabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) were generated from The Observing System Research and Predictability Experiment (THORPEX) Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) database from July to October 2010 using data from Europe (ECMWF), the United Kingdom [Met Office (UKMO)], the United States (NCEP), and Canada [Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC)]. Forecasts of 24-h accumulated precipitation were evaluated at 1° grid spacing within the contiguous United States against analysis data based on gauges and bias-corrected radar data.PQPFs from ECMWF?s ensembles generally had the highest skill of the raw ensemble forecasts, followed by CMC. Those of UKMO and NCEP were less skillful. PQPFs from CMC forecasts were the most reliable but the least sharp, and PQPFs from NCEP and UKMO ensembles were the least reliable but sharper.Multimodel PQPFs were more reliable and skillful than individual ensemble prediction system forecasts. The improvement was larger for heavier precipitation events [e.g., >10 mm (24 h)?1] than for smaller events [e.g., >1 mm (24 h)?1].ECMWF ensembles were statistically postprocessed using extended logistic regression and the five-member weekly reforecasts for the June?November period of 2002?09, the period where precipitation analyses were also available. Multimodel ensembles were also postprocessed using logistic regression and the last 30 days of prior forecasts and analyses. The reforecast-calibrated ECMWF PQPFs were much more skillful and reliable for the heavier precipitation events than ECMWF raw forecasts but much less sharp. Raw multimodel PQPFs were generally more skillful than reforecast-calibrated ECMWF PQPFs for the light precipitation events but had about the same skill for the higher-precipitation events; also, they were sharper but somewhat less reliable than ECMWF reforecast-based PQPFs. Postprocessed multimodel PQPFs did not provide as much improvement to the raw multimodel PQPF as the reforecast-based processing did to the ECMWF forecast.The evidence presented here suggests that all operational centers, even ECMWF, would benefit from the open, real-time sharing of precipitation forecast data and the use of reforecasts.