YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Timing of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Relative to Total Lightning Activity

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2011:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 012::page 3871
    Author:
    MacGorman, Donald R.
    ,
    Apostolakopoulos, Ivy R.
    ,
    Lund, Nicole R.
    ,
    Demetriades, Nicholas W. S.
    ,
    Murphy, Martin J.
    ,
    Krehbiel, Paul R.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00047.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he first flash produced by a storm usually does not strike ground, but little has been published concerning the time after the first flash before a cloud-to-ground flash occurs, particularly for a variety of climatological regions. To begin addressing this issue, this study analyzed data from very-high-frequency (VHF) lightning mapping systems, which detect flashes of all types, and from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), which identifies flash type and detects roughly 90% of cloud-to-ground flashes overall. VHF mapping data were analyzed from three regions: north Texas, Oklahoma, and the high plains of Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska. The percentage of storms in which a cloud-to-ground flash was detected in the first minute of lightning activity varied from 0% in the high plains to 10%?20% in Oklahoma and north Texas. The distribution of delays to the first cloud-to-ground flash varied similarly. In Oklahoma and north Texas, 50% of storms produced a cloud-to-ground flash within 5?10 min, and roughly 10% failed to produce a cloud-to-ground flash within 1 h. In the high plains, however, it required 30 min for 50% of storms to have produced a cloud-to-ground flash, and 20% produced no ground flash within 1 h. The authors suggest that the reason high plains storms take longer to produce cloud-to-ground lightning is because the formation of the lower charge needed to produce most cloud-to-ground flashes is inhibited either by delaying the formation of precipitation in the mid- and lower levels of storms or by many of the storms having an inverted-polarity electrical structure.
    • Download: (1.507Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Timing of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Relative to Total Lightning Activity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4229651
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMacGorman, Donald R.
    contributor authorApostolakopoulos, Ivy R.
    contributor authorLund, Nicole R.
    contributor authorDemetriades, Nicholas W. S.
    contributor authorMurphy, Martin J.
    contributor authorKrehbiel, Paul R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:29:13Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:29:13Z
    date copyright2011/12/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-86127.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229651
    description abstracthe first flash produced by a storm usually does not strike ground, but little has been published concerning the time after the first flash before a cloud-to-ground flash occurs, particularly for a variety of climatological regions. To begin addressing this issue, this study analyzed data from very-high-frequency (VHF) lightning mapping systems, which detect flashes of all types, and from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), which identifies flash type and detects roughly 90% of cloud-to-ground flashes overall. VHF mapping data were analyzed from three regions: north Texas, Oklahoma, and the high plains of Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska. The percentage of storms in which a cloud-to-ground flash was detected in the first minute of lightning activity varied from 0% in the high plains to 10%?20% in Oklahoma and north Texas. The distribution of delays to the first cloud-to-ground flash varied similarly. In Oklahoma and north Texas, 50% of storms produced a cloud-to-ground flash within 5?10 min, and roughly 10% failed to produce a cloud-to-ground flash within 1 h. In the high plains, however, it required 30 min for 50% of storms to have produced a cloud-to-ground flash, and 20% produced no ground flash within 1 h. The authors suggest that the reason high plains storms take longer to produce cloud-to-ground lightning is because the formation of the lower charge needed to produce most cloud-to-ground flashes is inhibited either by delaying the formation of precipitation in the mid- and lower levels of storms or by many of the storms having an inverted-polarity electrical structure.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Timing of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Relative to Total Lightning Activity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue12
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-11-00047.1
    journal fristpage3871
    journal lastpage3886
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2011:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian